Debunking The O9A, Again?

O9A Insight Role
O9A Insight Role

A recent essay {1} – the second of a three part series, much of which series is devoted to the Order of Nine Angles (ONA, O9A) – is a rather strange and somewhat contradictory work for at least three reasons.

First, the exposition of the philosophy Heidegger, which is informative, balanced, reasonably detailed and reasonably accurate. Second, because the author makes some valid points about ONA philosophy and praxis and about its influence, albeit that such (mostly covert) influence is seldom appreciate by self-described, Levey-inspired, ‘satanists’. Third, because the author, when discussing the ONA, apparently cannot resist from making pejorative comments about Myatt – “pompous pseudo-intellectual crap,” “mental-o-path” – and includes a link to some internet article about by some anonymous person which makes malicious accusations about Myatt based on no factual evidence whatsoever. {2}

In addition, the author – in common with many other authors who via the internet write about the ONA – makes the presumption that David Myatt = Anton Long even though no actual evidence from primary sources is provided (or referenced) regarding such a claim, and not attempt made to explain (a) that Myatt has always denied being Anton Long, and (b) that, to date, no one has provided any factual evidence from primary sources to substantiate such a claim.

It is thus difficult to ascertain just who the intended audience of these articles are, and what the intent the author has. For the tone varies from fairly detached, when for instance discussing Heidegger, to almost propagandistic when discussing Myatt and when asserting that Myatt=Long and when providing a web-link to malicious allegations without providing (as in the custom with unbiased internet essays) a web-link to where such allegations are debunked or countered {2}.

Nevertheless, despite there reservations, the article – and the previous one – are worthwhile reads providing as they do some informative insights regarding how the ONA relates to contemporary esotericism and how, in the author’s opinion, it relates to modern philosophy.

In our view, the author rather overstates the relation of the ONA to modern philosophy and especially to Heidegger. For two reasons. Firstly, that Anton Long – whomsoever he was – developed and refined ONA esoteric philosophy as he himself ventured along the Seven Fold Way and acquired more insight. Thus the older, 1970s-1990s, texts (such as the Symbols and Being MS in the 1980s Naos) should be read in the context of what Anton Long wrote from around the year 2000 until his retirement in 2011.

Second, even though the raison d’etre of ONA praxis is the same now as it always was it has been more eloquently and probably more accurately expressed by Anton Long in his later writings, as the following quotes illustrate.

1. {quote} Our real work, both as individuals and as an Order – our Magnum Opus – is genuinely esoteric and Occult, and thus concerned with lapis philosophicus and not with some purely causal self-indulgence, or some ephemeral outer change in some causal form or forms, or with using such forms to try and effect some external change. {3} {/quote}

2. {quote} There is only lapis philosophicus and its individual discovery. There are only those, on their own individual journeyings, journeying in their own way in their own species of Time, and who may or may not arrive at their planned destination. For we are life, the Cosmos; we are Time beyond its perceived illusive dichotomy and are and have been and will be Being, presenced and unpresenced, particular and general, past-present-future, and beyond the illusion, the deception, of ‘a being’ and of ‘beings’. {4} {/quote}

2. {quote} The story ends with an anticipated discovery: that the penultimate stage (however named: Magus, GrandMaster, GrandLadyMaster) of that life-long genuine Occult journey which begins with initiation (of whatever kind:
hermetic, ceremonial, self) is the same whether one began on, and thence followed, what has been described as ‘The Left Hand Path’, or whether one began on, and thence followed, what has been described as ‘The Right Hand Path’. For in the context of beyond The Abyss, such designations based on such a dichotomy become, and are, irrelevant because without sense and meaning. That is, the ‘outer secret’ of the inner, the real, the living, alchemy is that the end and the result of both our apparently separate journeys is the same; the same place, the same understanding, the same knowledge. For wisdom is undivided, the same for all of us, whatever we believed or assumed when we began. {5} {/quote}

2017 ev

{2} The de-bunking of that malicious allegation is included on p.7 of the following old (2010) file:
The debunking post was taken from a now deceased internet forum where that particular Myatt stalker used to regularly ply their allegations. Consequent to such allegations, someone O9A (in her role as a journalist) contacted the relevant Police authority who confirmed that in respect of that particular incident no complaint about Myatt had been received from anyone, anonymous or otherwise, and nor was Myatt the subject of any investigation. Subsequent research by the journalist revealed that any incident involving or complaint to the Police or investigation by any Police force regarding Myatt was always referred to Special Branch and thence to MI5, given that he was – between the 1990s and until around 2011 – a “significant person of interest” given his violent neo-nazi past, his arrest in 1998 for incitement to murder, and his subsequent support of bin Laden and al-Qaida.
See also
{3} O9A Adversarial Action – Success or Failure? 122yfayen
{4} The Enigmatic Truth. 2011
{5} Lapis Philosophicus. 2/2/123 yfayen

The Geryne of Satan


We republish here the seminal, scholarly, Order of Nine Angles text The Geryne of Satan which presents an antinomian, a heretical, view of the terms Satan and Satanism.

A heretical, antinomian, view because the text reveals – contrary to the modern orthodoxy as accepted by self-described ‘satanists’ inspired by or followers of Howard Levey – that Satan, as originally described, refers to a being who is an opponent of those who considered themselves as chosen by their vengeful, monotheistic, god. That is, Satan was an opponent of the Jews.

Hence why some consider that the Order of Nine Angles, with their promotion of the modern heresy of National Socialism, and with their Vindex mythos, is far more ‘Satanic’ than those self-described ‘satanists’ and self-declared ‘satanist’ groups inspired by or followers of the so-called ‘satanism’ of Howard Levey, the Yahodi.

The Geryne of Satan

Terrorism And The O9A

O9A Insight Role
O9A Insight Role

Recently some anonymous self-described ‘satanist’ – via some internet blog – wrote, in some attempt to distance modern (Levey – Magian – type) ‘satanism’ from ‘terrorism’, that:

{quote} This writer would like to highlight a problem within Satanist ranks called the Order of Nine Angles who share and promote similar extremist views to those of the Islamic State. The ONA was founded and is under the leadership of David Myatt, who formerly called himself Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt and Abdul al-Qari, and encouraged similarly extremist views as is pandered by Islamic extremists. The ONA are deeply embedded into Satanism, and sadly whilst they exist in our ranks, we are open to accusations of promoting similar outrages as has been inflicted upon the innocent by extremist Muslims. Like the Muslims it is down to the majority in Satanism to prevent the small minority (ONA) from being the image and voice of our religion.{/quote}

In a reply to their article we posted the following comment, which of course we do not expect to be published on their so-called ‘hardcore’ satanist blog.


Regarding the ONA and terrorism, you should have mentioned the following two texts written by “Anton Long” many years ago.

1) “We of the Order of Nine Angles do not, never have, and never will condemn acts of so-called terrorism (individual or undertaken by some State), nor do we condemn and avoid what mundanes regard as evil or as criminal deeds. For us, all such things are or could be just causal forms or causal means, and thus are regarded by us as falling into three categories, which categories are not necessarily mutually exclusive: (1) things which might or which can be the genesis of our individual pathei-mathos and which thus are the genesis of our own sinister weltanschauung; (2) things which aid our sinister dialectic or which are or might be a Presencing of The Dark; or (3) things that can or could be a test, a challenge, a sinister experience, too far for someone who aspires to be one of our sinister kind, someone who thus fails the test, balks at the challenge, or is destroyed or overcome by the experience.

For our criteria are not those of morality; are not bounded by some abstract good and evil; are not those defined by the laws manufactured by mundanes. Our criteria is the amorality of personal judgement and personal responsibility, whereby we as individuals decide what may be right or wrong for us based on our own pathei-mathos, and act and take responsibility for our acts, knowing such acts for the exeatic living they are or might be, and knowing ourselves as nexions possessed of the ability, the potential, to consciously – via pathei-mathos and practical sinister experience – change ourselves into a new, a more evolved, species of life. Herein is the essence of Satanism, for us.” A Satanism Too Far

2) “It is of fundamental importance – to evolution both individual and otherwise – that what is Dark, Sinister or Satanic is made real in a practical way, over and over again. That is, that what is dangerous, awesome, numinous, tragic, deadly, terrible, terrifying and beyond the power of ordinary mortals, laws or governments to control is made manifest. In effect, non-Initiates (and even Initiates) need constantly reminding that such things still exist; they need constantly to be brought ‘face-to-face’, and touched, with what is, or appears to be, inexplicable, uncontrollable, powerful and ‘evil’. They need reminding of their own mortality – of the unforeseen, inexplicable ‘powers of Fate’, of the powerful force of ‘Nature’.

If this means killing, wars, suffering, sacrifice, terror, disease, tragedy and disruption, then such things must be – for it is one of the duties of a Satanic Initiate to so Presence The Dark, and prepare the way for, or initiate, the change and evolution which always result from such things. Such things as these must be, and always will be, because the majority of people are or will remain, inert and sub-human unless changed. The majority is – and always will be until it evolves to become something else – raw material to be used, moulded, cut-away and shaped to create what must be. There is no such thing as an innocent person because everyone who exists is part of the whole, the change, the evolution, the presencing of life itself, which is beyond them, and their life only has meaning through the change, development and evolution of life. Their importance is what they can become, or what can be achieved through their death. their tragedy, their living – their importance does not lie in their individual happiness or their individual desires or whatever.” To Presence The Dark

Now, if these quotes are not “Satanic” and evil and “hardcore” and “antinomian”, then what or who is?


Certainly not The Satanic Temple nor the Church of Rational Satanism nor the Church of Satan; nor any other self-described ‘satanic’ groups or individuals – even those laughingly describing themselves as “hardcore satanists” – who all seem at pains to depict modern Satanism as no threat to anyone, as rather tame, and certainly not as genuinely, in practical life-threatening terms, antinomian, violent, and murderous.

Surely “Anton Long”, who wrote the articles from which the above quotations are taken, qualifies as evil and Satanic and antinomian, and perhaps even as a terrorist?


Kudos to whomsoever publishes the aforementioned ‘hardcore, satanicviews’ blog, for he/she/they published our comment and commented on it, to which comment of theirs we replied:

You wrote: “ONA was never Satanism.”

That is a moot point because it depends on how one defines “satanism” and “evil”. Obviously followers of Howard Levey define both terms so that their “satanism” is not “actually or potentially harmful, destructive, disastrous, pernicious; baleful; terrifying,” and so that they themselves are not “malicious; mischievous, sly, bad, dangerous, deadly.”

So it’s not a question of Nazarene definitions but of what is “actually or potentially harmful, destructive, disastrous, pernicious; baleful; terrifying,” and who are “malicious; mischievous, sly, bad, dangerous, deadly,” in real life.

Just trying to redefine “Satan” so that “he” isn’t “malicious; mischievous, sly, bad, dangerous, deadly, pernicious; baleful”, destructive” but instead is just some sort of “symbol” of carnality and egoism doesn’t answer basic ontological questions.

Or to put it simply, the ONA would say – and have said – that “Satan” is the archetypal “terrorist”. Which kind of places the remarks of some minor Islamic preacher into perspective […]

A minor point – perhaps, but you keep mentioning David Myatt in relation to the Order of Nine Angles and “Anton Long” even though you provide no evidence from primary sources that Myatt=Long or that Myatt founded or was involved with the ONA. Until you – or anyone – does provide such evidence from primary sources then you’re only making assumptions or repeating the unverified allegations of others.

Surely, if you really believed in the tenets of your Howard Levey style ‘satanism’ you’d either stop repeating verbatim the unverified allegations of others about a public figure or you’d add the words “alleged” or “allegation” when you mention Myatt in relation to Anton Long and the ONA.

But what amuses “us” the most about the very many comments Levey-inspired ‘satanists’ make and have made in the past decade about the Order of Nine Angles is that they show no esoteric understanding of, or have no interest in, ONA references to items such as Keynes MS 27 in the library of King’s College, Cambridge, or to Keynes MS 32 in the same library, or to MS 416, in Babson College’s Grace K. Babson Collection of the Works of Sir Isaac Newton, currently housed in the Huntington Library, San Marino, California. Not to mention that they show no esoteric understanding of, or have no interest in, Sloane MS 3189 in the British Library, nor in the passage in Iamblichus which mentions μητρίζω. And of course why they have no comment on the fact that the ONA has a distinct ontology while the ‘satanism’ of Levey does not. And so on and so on.

Instead, all we ever get from the likes of them is propaganda and allegations about the ONA as if they believe or hope that their propaganda and allegations and their argumentum ad nauseam will deflect attention away from the ONA.

Being Heretical, Again


With news that (i) Google web-search has hired 10,000 people world-wide to help them delete from search-engine results any links that might contradict the official – Western government sponsored – version of ‘the Shoah’ {1}, and (ii) that the Zionist entity that occupies Palestine has demanded that Amazon stop selling books that “deny the holocaust” {2}, we republish here a collection of some heretical Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA) material titled Magian Occultism, which includes banned texts such as (a) The Theory of The Holocaust, (b) The Rite of Defiance, and (c) The Black Mass of Heresy. {3}{4}

Given that our dear and heretical blog does not appear in Google search results anyway, we have no fear of being “blacklisted”. Meanwhile, since Levey-lovers who – without any evidence from primary sources {5} – denigrate the O9A are given prominence in web search results for the O9A, we also republish the polemical text Lambasting Levey And Aquino, staunch defenders as both Howard Levey and Michael Aquino were and are, with their qabalistic Occultism, of the Magian status quo.

Magian Occultism

Lambasting Levey And Aquino



{2} Nathan Jeffay: “Under pressure, Amazon stops selling Holocaust-denial books.” Jewish Chronicle, London, March 8, 2017

{3} The texts are banned in European countries such as Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, Poland; and in other countries such as Canada, Russia, and Australia.

{5} For an honest appraisal of the O9A stance on National Socialism, see

{5} Refer for example to (a) and (b)