Amesbury Incident Latest: Extradition

°°°°°°°°°

An anticipated anti-Russian development in the nerve agent (Novichok) attacks in Amesbury and Salisbury has now been made public. It is an extradition request to Moscow for the two Russians suspected of carrying out the attacks, with an unnamed security source saying that “the attack on the Skripals was ordered by the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence service.” {1}

The facts which have probative value in this matter of such an extradition request – and in the claim that the GRU ordered the attack – have not been made public, and will not be made public. Instead, and yet again, we the people are expected to trust “police and security sources” who say that they have investigated the movements of the two Russians from their entry into Britain to their departure to Russia, and that the nerve agent
                  “used to attack the Skripals on 4 March was applied from a perfume bottle sprayed or smeared on to their front doorknob,” and that “the bottle was dropped somewhere in the city, where it was later picked up by Rowley, who gave it to Sturgess.” {1}

Yet this bland statement contradicts what one of the victims – Charlie Rowley – initially said following his recovery. He said that the perfume bottle was in a sealed box of a well-known perfume manufacturer and wrapped up, with one newspaper writing that his statement “may undermine the line of inquiry that the novichok that he and Sturgess came into contact with had been discarded by the attackers of the Skripals.” {2}

So now we the people are expected to believe that the two Russians suspects, after the using the bottle in the Salisbury attack, took the time and trouble to neatly box it in a perfume box and then sealed and wrapped the box and then just threw the box away.

        At first Rowley said he found the bottle behind some shops in Salisbury city centre and then later on – since his initial, clear, and quite detailed account of a sealed box casts doubt on the accusations against the Russian suspects made by police and security sources – he back-tracked and said he “couldn’t remember” where he found the sealed box and that his memory of events is “vague”. {3}

To muddy the waters still further – since the accusation that Rowley had found the bottle used in the Salisbury attack, which bottle was neatly wrapped up, is ludicrous – it has now been reported that “Investigators have not ruled out the possibility that another bottle of novichok may have been dumped by the culprits.” {3}

So we now have the “vague memory” story and also the “two bottle” theory. The first bottle – never found – was used in the first attack, and the second – apparently never used and neatly wrapped in a box – was just thrown away somewhere in Salisbury where Rowley found it.

       Confused by all the twists and turns? We the people are expected to be and hence expected to simply trust what our government and security sources say. For neither the government – nor, apparently, the security services – believe that we the people should see and hear, have access to, all the facts which have probative value in order to, like jurors in a criminal trial, consider for ourselves whether there is sufficient evidence to return a guilty verdict.

In this matter, as in so many others, it has been decided by the government that it is “not in the public interest” for we the people to have access to all the facts which have probative value, with the added excuse here – as again, so often – of such access being “detrimental to the security of the country.”

So much for democracy, of open and honest government by the people for the people.

That the extradition request – with the inevitable refusal by Russia to extradite the suspects – will be used by the government and others for anti-Putin and anti-Russian propaganda purposes, as well demands for more sanctions against Russia, is also inevitable, revealing the real purpose behind such a request.

°°°

{1} https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/aug/06/uk-poised-to-ask-russia-to-extradite-salisbury-attack-suspects

{2} https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/24/novichok-victim-ill-within-15-minutes-says-partner-charlie-rowley

{3} https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/salisbury-poisoning-latest-charlie-rowley-amesbury-novichok-spy-bins-a8475071.html

°°°°°

Related:

° https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/amesbury-incident-update/
° https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/07/04/the-amesbury-incident/


Amesbury Incident Update

odal3

°°°°°°°

Amesbury Incident Update
Hypocrisy, Politicians, And Probative Value

 

Hypocrisy And Politicians

As predicted by the sagacious – by those whose guides are reason, fairness, and evidence which has probative value – the death of the woman involved in the Amesbury incident has led to politicians and others to express hypocritical outrage. Thus the British Prime Minister said she was “appalled and shocked by the death.”

Why is such outrage hypocritical? Because there is a political agenda behind it and because it ignores the fact that on average, around 3 women a day are killed in Britain {1} while between 2009 and 2015, 936 women were killed by men they knew {2} and which number of murders is far more than those who in Britain lost their lives due to acts of terrorism during the same period.

Did the current Prime Minister and former Prime Ministers publicly state that they were “appalled and shocked” by the death of each of those women? Did they send their “thoughts and condolences” to the families of each victim? Did they state that their government was “committed to providing full support to the local community” as it dealt with each such tragedy? No of course not.

Did the local police involved in such murders, as is now the case with Amesbury incident, have a squad of over 100 detectives from outside their area assist them? No of course not.

Why not? Because such deaths did not serve the political agendas of the government of the day while the death of the woman in the Amesbury incident does serve the political agenda of the government of the day. To wit, their propaganda campaign against Russia and especially against Vladimir Putin.

Probative Value

As also predicted by the sagacious, the British Home Secretary – following the death of the woman involved in the Amesbury incident – propagandistically stated, without providing or citing any evidence, that “we know back in March that it was the Russians. We know it was a barbaric, inhuman act by the Russian state.”

We are thus entitled to ask obvious questions such as: “Where is the evidence for such accusations? Where is or was it published and made available to we the people?” Available to we the people – the supposed basis for their government – so that we may make our own, individual, and informed, opinion based on evidence which has probative value.

Until there is such publicly available evidence “we the people” are supposed to trust the politicians who make such accusations, and – when pressed on the matter of evidence (as they seldom if ever are by journalists) – are supposed to trust their vague statements about “intelligence” gathered by the security services “proving” such accusations, although such “intelligence” is never published at the time and when on the few occasions that it is (years later after its propaganda value is no longer relevant) it is often “redacted” and as in the case of purported Iraqi weapons of mass destruction often shown to be false and propagandistic.

Thus instead of treating “we the people” with respect, as intelligent beings, modern politicians of modern democracies condescendingly expect us to trust them, believe their propaganda, and ignore their utter hypocrisy.

For such politicians, the death of one women in one incident provides them with political opportunities, while the murder of thousands of other women – often in more barbaric circumstances – is not even a footnote in the history of modern British democracy.

Is such modern democracy still fit for purpose? Or does it, as we are inclined to believe, need reforming, so that in the words of one perspicacious commentator,

                  “leaders and politicians must have such personal character-revealing experience as qualifies them to lead and to govern, with that personal experience consisting of proven and years-long ‘front line’ service to their country and to their people such as in the armed forces or serving as a ‘first responder’ in such occupations as paramedic, a police officer, and in the Fire & Rescue service.” {3}

Three Wyrd Sisters
9th July 2018 ev

{1} The Guardian, One woman dead every three days, 14 December 2017.

{2} Helen Pidd, The Guardian, 7 December 2016.

{3} https://davidmyatt.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/the-moment-of-my-reading/

°°°°°°°

Related:
https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/07/04/the-amesbury-incident/


The Amesbury Incident

°°°°°°°

The Amesbury Incident
More Unanswered Questions

The revelation that two – apparently ordinary – British citizens are critically ill as a result of contact with the same nerve agent (Novichok) that seriously affected a former Soviet double-agent and his daughter in nearby Salisbury raises serious and interesting questions that the mainstream British and overseas Media have so far failed to mention.

As in the case of the Salisbury incident there is no mention of the financial and work background of the person or persons involved.

For instance in the case of the double-agent living in Salisbury, did he (as some sources seem to indicate) have recent meetings with MI6 and other security services and if so was the information he passed to the security services about Russian criminal oligarchs or about Russian organized crime or about the government of Mr Putin?

As we noted in a previous article:

                  “The nerve gas used – Novichok – was produced in Soviet era Russia and given the chaos that resulted from, and continued for some time after, the demise of the Soviet Union it is possible that small quantities of it might have been obtained by “rogue operators” belonging to or affiliated with either organized Russian crime syndicates and/or corrupt Russian oligarchs. Second, that details of the activities of the former British spy over the past five and more years – for instance his possible association with organized Russian crime, or with exiled oligarchs, or even with various Intelligence services – are either not known, or if known to the British Intelligence services, have not been made public by them or by any member of the British government briefed by the British Intelligence services.” {1}

In the case of the apparently “ordinary” citizens, the obvious questions to ask are: what were they up to recently or in the past few years; how did the man involved managed to support himself and buy a new and expensive property when he apparently was not working; what recent trips had he recently taken – in Britain or abroad – in recent months and years and who did he meet; were the pair drug addicts who needed money to fuel their habit?

Instead of asking such rational questions – questions germane to any police inquiry involving a serious offence – about the background of the apparently “ordinary” citizens living in Amesbury, journalists and Media commentators are already diverting attention away from such obvious questions by making statements such as that “the most likely hypothesis is that this is leftover Novichok from the attack on the Skripals back in March. Perhaps this is some of the Novichok prepared for the attack and discarded: maybe somewhere like a park, a house, and maybe these two [accidentally] came across it.”

In addition, according to Dr Vil Sultanovich Mirzayano, a Russian scientist who was part of the team that developed the nerve agent, it could not have survived in the open given both the time between the Salisbury incident and the Amesbury incident and the weather conditions in that part of England. He also said that the new incident must have involved a new batch of the agent.

Thus the most obvious explanation is that those apparently “ordinary” citizens may (i) have been responsible for or in some way involved with the Salisbury incident, or (ii) that the man had some connection to the players involved in the Salisbury incident, whomsoever those players were employed by, be such employers a Russian criminal oligarch or a Russian organized crime syndicate.

For as with the double-agent involved with the Salisbury incident, those involved in the Amesbury incident may well have had some connection to a Russian criminal oligarch, or to a Russian organized crime syndicate, or had fallen foul of such people by passing information about such people to the security services, with it being such people who are the obvious suspects in both incidents and with it being standard procedure for the security services to usually deny any connection between victims or perpetrators of a crime and the intelligence services.

Yet again, as with the Salisbury incident, the British government pointed the finger at Russia and at Mr Putin accusing Russia “of using Britain as a dumping ground for poison,” with the Media more than willing to avoid asking obvious questions and more than willing to parrot whatever (anti-Putin) propaganda the government deigns to manufacture about the Amesbury incident. One part of which propaganda is undoubtedly comments such as “there was nothing in the couple’s background to suggest the pair had been targeted” and which comments the people are expected to take on trust since the evidence allegedly behind such a comment is not made public. Just like the alleged evidence about Iraq having “weapons of mass destruction” – a pretext for invasion and war – was never made public at the time.

We can expect, yet again, that most of the population will either believe such government propaganda or be indifferent to the ignoble machinations and the sheer hypocrisy of their governments, machinations obvious in the lack of probative evidence for governmental anti-Putin claims and the desire by governments to hide from public scrutiny the answers to the aforementioned obvious questions that the security services already have or will undoubtedly find.

That “the public” en masse do not seem to have the nous to ask – and demand answers from their governments to – obvious rational questions about both incidents reveals just how little we as a species have evolved in the past few centuries.

In addition, as we noted in another article, in relation to Russia:

                  “It might well be the most truly Western nation of all, with those now arraigned against it just lackeys of a materialistic America led by a Vulgarian who will, as described the former CIA chief John Brennan who resigned rather than take orders from a draft-dodger, take his “rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history” once the full extent of his “venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known.”

After all, who is the leader most reminiscent of the forthright men of Greece and Rome, of the European Renaissance? Vladimir Putin, law graduate, former military officer, and Judo expert, who brought order to Russia after the chaos that followed the fall of the Soviet Union? Or the draft-dodging, vain, pompous, irrational, vulgarian with tinted false hair?” {2}

T.W.S.
July 2018 ev
N.B. This article – published on the 4th July – has been and will be updated as and when new information becomes available. Last updated 6th July 2018 ev.

°°°°°°°

{1} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/03/14/russophobia-an-aeonic-perspective/
{2} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/a-repeat-performance/

°°°°°°°

Related:
https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/04/10/the-propaganda-campaign-against-russia-intensifies/


England 2018

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

Here are just a few of the violent events that occurred in England within one week this month of May:

                  § Emile Cilliers, an Army Sergeant, was convicted of the attempted murder his wife Victoria by tampering with her parachutes. She survived a 4,000ft fall after both her main and her reserve parachute failed.

                   § Zak Bolland and David Worral were convicted of murdering four children by throwing petrol bombs into their home.

                   § Sabrina Kouider and Ouissem Medouni were convinced of torturing and murdering Sophie Lionnet.

                   § Two teenage boys were convicted of plotting a Columbine-style massacre at a school in North Yorkshire.

                   § A woman was sentenced to life imprisonment for throwing sulphuric acid at, and disfiguring, her partner Mark van Dongen.

                   § Two teenage robbers, Nathan Gilmaney and Troy Thomas, were convicted of stabbing a charity worker to death while attempting to steal his mobile phone.

                   § A 24-year-old man was stabbed to death in East London, just one of more than 60 murders in London in the first five months of 2018, which is more murders than were committed in the whole of New York city during the same period.

Such is the state of England’s “green and pleasant” land, 2018.

Which makes us to ask if we as a species have significantly changed, evolved. Are we still, inside, emotive barbarians? For what the foregoing violent events – and the so many other similar events, month after month, year after year – seem to reveal are individuals still prey to, or being subsumed by, selfish emotions. Ruled by personal desire; by personal greed; by a lack of self control; and devoid of empathy. And that despite Magna Carta, the establishment of Parliament, Parliamentary acts such as the Factory And Workshop Act of 1901, and universal suffrage.

People ruled by personal desire, by personal greed, by a lack of self control, and devoid of empathy, despite well over a hundred years of compulsory State education; despite two horrendous World Wars with the loss of millions upon millions of lives; and despite a “welfare State” designed to aid the well-being of and provide opportunities for its citizens.

       I remember a conversation – decades ago – which I, then a young and impressionable man, had with Colin Jordan following his move to Yorkshire. He stressed that “our” propaganda as modern English National Socialists should emphasize the difference between what England, what Britain, is now and what it might have been had Germany won the Second World War.

Would it be a land rife with such murders and such attempted murders? Or would it be a land where there was an “imperial imperative” – a Galactic Imperium – such as would betake us far away from murderous personal desire, far away from murderous personal greed, far away from a murderous lack of self control, to a world – a new age – of arête, of honour, of admiration for the warrior deeds of the likes of Leon Degrelle, and thence to a triumph over our individual will and our desires through service, through duty, to our folk and to such an imperial, such a Galactic, imperative?

Which brings me to what a certain “Anton Long” is reported to have said in a 2015 interview:

{quote}
                   “As for National-Socialism, what I in the past meant by National-Socialism is quite different from what the majority of people now assume or understand and have for decades assumed or understood by that term.

                   Perhaps I should add that [I am now] less and less interested in the minutiae of various causal machinations and manifestations, and more and more concerned […] with our human survival as a consciously-aware species who have (at least for now and in the immediate future) the capacity, the vision, the technology, to betake ourselves out into the vastness of the Cosmos and thus fulfil the wyrdful and numinous potential that I and some others intuit we mortals have. A wyrdful potential that would see us exploring other star systems and colonizing not only nearby planets such as Mars but also those planets we can discover by such a practical exploration of the Cosmos.

                   For I incline toward the view that whether we do this is inextricably bound to how we understand our current predicament on Earth and thus whether we can free ourselves from the constraints that so bind us now: abstractions, politics, religions, a lack of self-knowing, a lack of self-honesty, dishonour, and such personal egoistic desires as so often still subsume us. Which constraints the experiential Seven Fold Way (the ‘physis sorcery’) of the O9A was designed to break, containing as that esoteric Way does a necessary, human, enantiodromia – a melding of the masculous with the muliebral – and presencing as it does, as those who reach the stage of Internal Adept discover, the essence of culture […]

                   Unfortunately we en masse still are, and have been for so many centuries, weighed down by ourselves: by emotive reactions, by denotatum, by abstractions, and latterly by that presumption of knowing (that hubris) which externally projects such things as a ‘dialectic’ (and its apparent necessary) on what is past, present, and possible, even though we now have – after centuries of mortal pathei-mathos howsoever presenced – an apprehension, or the possibility of such a apprehension, beyond all those artificial divisions. For, as I once wrote, it is not correct to gave names to some things. Which is why empathy – its cultivation, its species of wordless apprehension – and the acausal knowing that such a faculty, and internal techniques such as The Star Game and Esoteric Chant, develope, were and are the raison d’être of the praxis that is the Seven Fold Way, despite what so many seem to have assumed about that Way; a Way which – given the axiom of the authority of individual judgement – should naturally evolve.

                   Yet again I sense that only a few individuals – now and in the next few decades – will know and understand what I am talking about here. Just as what has been denoted in our own times by the term ‘holocaust denial’ will, hundreds of years from now – again, assuming such personal qualities as I previously mentioned will still be appreciated, or have survived – be understood by the sagacious as something germane to times past; as just one more supposed heresy among the so many ‘heresies’ that have so unreasonably condemned so many century after century. ” {1}{2}
{/quote}

Richard Stirling
May 2018 ev

{1} https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/interview-with-anton-long.pdf
{2} To paraphrase what some other comrades have written, I make no claim as to the authenticity of that interview, and leave that judgment to the reader


Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West

The actual zeitgeist of the governments of the modern West – as opposed to the imagined zeitgeist that many people seem to believe in – was evident in a recent event. Which event was the attack in May 2018 on unarmed Muslim civilians by the army of the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine and which attack resulted in 58 Muslims killed with over 2,000 injured. The Muslims were protesting at the American government moving its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in compliance to Zionist demands.

Officials of the American government failed to condemn the massacre of civilians, with the Zionists blaming Muslim “terrorists” for the violence, even though not one Zionist soldier was injured or killed. In addition, the governments of Europe merely expressed “some concern” at the events, although had some Muslims, somewhere in the world, killed 58 civilians and injured over 2,000, those governments would assuredly have stridently condemned such an attack, called it “an atrocity”, and demanded that the killers “be brought to justice.”

The zeitgeist is also evident in another recent event. The imposition by the government of America, again at the behest of the Zionist entity, of even more punitive sanctions on Iran with the excuse being to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons even though the Zionist entity has – in violation of international treaties – developed nuclear weapons and has not been, is not being, and will not be, subject to international sanctions for so developing such weapons.

       The zeitgeist is thus one of hypocrisy, of double standards, and of uncritical support – economic, financial, military, propagandistic and otherwise – for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine, with overt criticism of that entity and of its policies deemed to be, especially in European countries, “anti-Semitism” and regarded by all Western governments as “morally repugnant” and as “hate speech.” The career of any Western politician who dares to criticize, for whatever reason, the Zionist entity will be over, as the recent case of Ken Livingstone, former Mayor of London, illustrates.

The new zeitgeist of the West is founded – as the Zionist entity was – on one modern legend and one old myth. The old myth is that God intended Palestine for those who consider themselves “the chosen people” and who thus regard themselves as the descendants of the Hebrew tribes mentioned in the Old Testament, and who sincerely believe that

                  “The Jews were chosen to act as pathfinders for the world, and Israel has a special place as an instrument to effect the Jew’s social engineering upon the world.” {1}{2}

The modern legend is of “evil Nazis” who persecuted and then deliberately exterminated millions of “the chosen people” leaving those who remained with a duty to emigrate to and settle in Palestine and thus force (or by various means persuade) the Muslims who lived there to leave.

This zeitgeist – and the uncritical support engendered, especially by both past American governments and the current government of America – has assured the present success of the Zionist entity, commercially, financially, economically, and military. A success and a zeitgeist evident, for example, in that the entity is now advertised and accepted as a “European-type” tourist destination for Western peoples and is included in the “Eurovision Song Contest” even though it is not, geographically, in Europe.

Yet successful as the Zionist entity now appears to be, what its government, and those in the Western governments who support it, forget or do not know – what those who resort to “in time” methods and tactics always forget or never seem to know – is the Aeonic, the “above time”, aspect and perspective. {3}

An Aeonic Perspective

Perceived Aeonically, the Zionist entity may well be successful, for a while: be it for some decades, be it for a hundred years or perhaps more. However, their success is dependant on the continuing support of America, on a continuing belief among the peoples of the West in both the legend of the holocaust, and in the myth supported by evangelical/traditionalist Nazarenes (especially in America) that their support for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine is authorized by Nazarene Scripture which they believe revealed that their Nazarene God intended Palestine for those who consider themselves “the chosen people” as thus who regard themselves as the descendants of the Hebrews tribes mentioned in the Old Testament.

However,

§ Regarding American support, both the demographic and the belief of the people of America are changing. Demographically, the move is away from a White majority toward those hitherto ethnic minorities – the Hispanic and the Negro – who have an instinctive aversion to the policies and politics espoused by people such as The Vulgarian {4}. In terms of belief, it is estimated that, in America, every year around 3,000 Nazarene churches close due to falling congregations, with a 2017 study by the American based Public Religion Research Institute revealing that in 1996 around 65% of Americans identified themselves as White Christians while a decade or so later only 43% did so.

Thus it is reasonable to conclude that in a hundred or so years time the people of America, and their beliefs, will be different from that of today, with there being no guarantee of American support for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine.

§ Regarding belief among the peoples of the West in the legend of the holocaust, although it is likely that over the next three or four decades more Western lands will introduce Zionist-supported tyrannical laws making questioning “the holocaust” a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment, the history of Western peoples over the last three millennia reveals that rebellion against tyrannical laws is inevitable, sooner or later, be that later a century or more. For every tyranny, every Empire, has its day with none, in the entire history of humanity, lasting more than three or four centuries. There is always a revolution or rebellions; there is always the death – from natural causes or otherwise – of a tyrant or potentate; there is always a change of government; always the removal, the overthrow – violent or otherwise – of a ruling cabal. And there are always new ideals, new ideas, new ways of living, which replace – gradually or otherwise – the old.

§ Regarding the belief among Nazarenes that support for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine is authorized by Nazarene Scripture, the Nazarene religion itself is currently threatened by the spread of Islam which of course is why the Zionist entity – and supporters of that entity, such as the current American government – have waged and are waging both a propaganda and an actual or a proxy or an economic war against Muslim influence in the Middle East and elsewhere: such as in Afghanistan (actual war and invasion), Iraq (actual war and invasion), Syria (proxy war), Yemen (proxy war), Iran (economic war and agitation for regime change), Sinai (proxy war), Rakhine State (proxy war), Somalia (proxy war).

While Zionist and Western propaganda describes this war against Muslim influence as a “war on terror” it is in reality – as the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan has revealed – a war against Muslims living without Western influence and according to Shariah in their own lands. The hypocrisy of calling it a “war on terror” is evident in the fact that Western wars and invasions and proxy wars, and the Zionist entity, have killed far more Muslim civilians – tens upon tens of thousands – than Muslim “terrorist” groups have killed Western civilians and residents of the Zionist entity.

Zeitgeist Of The West, Heresy, And The O9A

That the original zeitgeist of the West has been replaced by the aforementioned Zionist-loving zeitgeist was explained in Myatt’s 1984 essay Vindex: Destiny Of The West {5}. In that text Myatt described the replacement zeitgeist as Magian and concluded that National Socialism – what it actually was, not what Zionist propaganda and the modern legend of ‘the holocaust’ has made it appear to be – was an expression of the original, Faustian, zeitgeist of the West, and that

                  “in its relation to what we have called the ethos of the West, National-Socialism, from its very beginnings in Munich in 1919, stands as an embodiment of that ethos. National-Socialism was a resurgence of basically Faustian values over and above the cultural dominance of the Magian.”

That National Socialism – correctly perceived and understood, as for example by means of the life and writings of Waffen-SS General Leon Degrelle {6} – is now a modern heresy, with promotion of such heresy and denial of modern legend of ‘the holocaust’ made illegal in several European lands, should be obvious.

Enter, into this heretical milieu, the esoteric Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA). Which modern esoteric movement {7} has antinomian Insight Roles {8} some of which involve supporting National Socialism and denying the modern legend of ‘the holocaust’, and which esoteric Order

                  “has always praised the warrior ethos, Hitler, and the Waffen-SS, and propagated the Vindex mythos, and emphasised the idea of a Galactic Imperium; and why the O9A values, and emphasises, both ‘the clan’ and ‘the tribe’ and such pagan ancestral European traditions as the Rounwytha.” {9}

In addition, the O9A has always promoted the idea – founded on scholarship – that

                  “as described in the O9A text The Geryne of Satan – (i) hasatan – the satan – refers (in the Septuagint) to the chief adversary (of the so-called ‘chosen ones’) and to the chief schemer against those who regard themselves as the chosen people of God/Jehovah, and (ii) “a satan” historically (in the Septuagint) refers to someone who is an adversary of and who thus is pejoratively regarded (by those so opposed) as scheming, as plotting against those who regard themselves as the chosen people of God/Jehovah.” {10}

That this heretical understanding of Satan and of Satanism has been usurped by the Media-supported egoistic, Magian, ‘satanism’ manufactured and propagated by Howard Stanton Levey (the Yahoudi, a.k.a. Anton Szandor LaVey) – and accepted by most self-described “neo-nazis” as defining Satanism – should be sufficient of itself to understand (i) how the Faustian zeitgeist of the West has been replaced by one based on a modern legend and an old myth, and (ii) what the O9A with its Aeonic understanding, its “sinister dialectic”, and its practical dangerous heresy, is all about, and (iii) why that acausal “sinister dialectic”, undermining as it does the status quo, is based on the knowledge, the wisdom, of the inevitable decline and fall of those individuals – and of those governments and entities – who are “in time” and who thus are enamoured of, and by, simplistic causal abstractions.

R.S.
May 2018 ev

{1} Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, Dr. Jakobovits, The Guardian newspaper (London), 7th August 1982.

{2} In this context, “social engineering” refers both (i) to government and State efforts (through for example laws, centralized planning, and propaganda) to influence the attitudes and ideas of people and the structure of society, and (ii) to efforts by the Media and special interest groups to bring about certain changes in society.

{3} The categories “in time” and “above time” refer to Savitri Devi’s book The Lightning and the Sun in which she describes three basic types of leaders. Those “in time” – like Genghis Khan – who concentrate on military might; those “above time” – like the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten – who are otherworldly; and those “against time” – like Adolf Hitler – who are both “in time” and “above time”, both Lightning and Sun. A similar though not identical concept occurs in the Sea of Fertility novels of Yukio Mishima in the characters of Kiyoaki Matsugae, Isao Iinuma, Ying Chan, and Toru Yasunaga.

{4} qv. (i) https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/01/06/the-vulgarian-gift-from-our-goddess/ and (ii) https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2017/12/13/the-vulgarian-archetypal-homo-hubris/

{5} Myatt’s Vindex essay is available at https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/vindex-destiny-of-the-west.pdf. Caveat: While kudos is due to the person who transcribed Myatt’s 1984 essay and made it available as an e-text, the digital text does contain some typos and a few errors and omissions.

{6} His writings include:

° The Eastern Front: Memoirs of a Waffen SS volunteer, 1941-1945. Institute for Historical Review. 2014. ISBN 9780939484768.

° Hitler, né à Versailles. 1–3. Paris: Art et histoire d’Europe. 1986. ISBN 2906026085.

° Ich war Gefangener. Nürnberg: Hesperos Verlag. 1944.

° Hitler pour 1000 ans. Paris: La Table Ronde. 1969.

{7} As described by Professor Monette on page 89 of his book Mysticism in the 21st Century published in 2013 by Sirius Academic Press, the O9A “is not a structured lodge or temple, but rather a movement, a subculture or perhaps metaculture that its adherents choose to embody or identify with.”

{8} By means of Insight Roles, the Order of Nine Angles “advocates continuous transgression of established norms, roles, and comfort zones in the development of the initiate […] This extreme application of ideas further amplifies the ambiguity of satanic and Left Hand Path practices of antinomianism, making it almost impossible to penetrate the layers of subversion, play and counter-dichotomy inherent in the sinister dialectics.” Faxneld, Per & Petersen, Jesper Aagaard, The Devil’s Party: Satanism in Modernity. 2013. Oxford University Press, p.15

{9} The O9A, Hitler, Vindex, And National-Socialism, 2016.

{10} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/traditional-and-modern-the-two-types-of-satanism/

°°°°°°°°°


The Mickey Mouse Activist

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

Editorial Note: Herewith an irreverent, heretical, controversial, dialectical post: the first in our occasional series of articles and polemics about current news and affairs with particular reference to “right-wing” politics and contemporary National Socialism.

Relevant & Necessary Disclosure: The “heretical” authors of these heretical posts are National Socialists who advocate the “ethical National Socialism” of Reichsfolk as described in Introduction To Reichsfolk (pdf), which posts have been previously published in the private Reichsfolk Times newsletter. It should also be noted that the pseudonym Haereticus – “a heretic” – is used by several, different, authors.

°°°°°°°

The Mickey Mouse Activist

All hail the new ‘hero’ of fascism {1} in Britain and often elsewhere: the activist who perfectly sums up the lamentable state of British fascism today, and the activist who also mirrors the Mickey Mouse fascists of today.

The new ‘hero’ is a convicted criminal – jailed for both a money-making scam and for identity fraud – who uses and has used several pseudonyms; who spent several years inciting often violent public disorder in the name of opposing Islam, and then, as a publicity stunt, claimed to be friendly with Muslims and to have left his former anti-Muslim extremism behind. He then did another volte-face, returned to spouting anti-Islam rhetoric, and claimed to be an ambassador for a charity which, set up by others, existed only on paper, {2} all of which antics garnished him substantial media coverage, perhaps in part designed to hype his ghost-written ‘autobiography’ – which, with typical puffery, declared him to be an “Enemy of the State” – and which was written and published to garnish him a reputation as some sort of significant figure on the fascist scene.

This new fascist hero is “Tommy Robinson” – a.k.a. Stephen Christopher Yaxley, a.k.a. Stephen Lennon, a.k.a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a.k.a. Andrew McMaster, a.k.a. Paul Harris.

How he supports himself and can afford to regularly travel around Britain and Europe is a mystery although his public support for Zionism and for the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine {3} as well as his bosom friendship with the likes of Jewish Islamophobe Pamela Geller may offer a clue. As may his other ‘ghost-written’ book, titled Mohammed’s Koran: Why Muslims Kill for Islam in which he has the hubris to pontificate at length about Islam, about the Prophet Muhammad, and about the Quran even though he cannot read Arabic, has to rely on translations and the opinions of others, has not studied the Quran and Sunnah under the guidance of Muslim scholars, and has never spent time living among Muslims in Muslim lands such as Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan. {4}

How he and cohorts can organize and finance a slick professional event in 2018 in Whitehall, London – with a ginormous television screen, international satellite feeds, and a high quality sound system – is also something of a mystery, given that even the BNP at the height of its popularity – with two Euro MP’s, paid employees, and several offices around the country – could not manage such a feat.

It is also something of a mystery why no one challenges or has challenged him – during one of his regular Media appearances, such as on the TV programme “Good Morning Britain” – about his ignorance regarding the Quran and his ignorance regarding the Muslim way of life. Why do the producers of such programmes not include a Muslim scholar who can, after quoting Arabic verses from the Quran and from the Sunnah, ask Mr Robinson to translate and explain them? Why does not someone ask Mr Robinson why, in relation to Muslims, he repeatedly commits a fallacy of illicit transference? Is it because Mr Robinson is a puppet of some cabal “behind the scenes” who want him to be seen as a viable leader of latter-day fascists?

That Mr Robinson, with his ignorance, his criminal past, his plebeian-like incitement, is representative of many latter-day fascists is self-evident. Does his behaviour, his character – and that of the majority of his supporters – conform to the warrior ideal of the elite Waffen SS, {5} or to the ideal of the SA who were constantly reminded of the need for

                  “Iron discipline! Exemplary appearance in public! The population […] must see in our SA a model of German breeding and orderliness…” {6}

No, the behaviour, the character, of Mr Robinson – and that of the majority of his supporters – does not and do not conform to the warrior ideal of the elite Waffen SS nor to the fascist ideal of the SA.

The likes of Oswald Mosley, Adolf Hitler, John Tyndall, and Colin Jordan would turn in their graves at the behaviour, the ignorance, and Mickey Mouse antics of Mr Robinson who has never once – to our knowledge – denounced “the holocaust” as a myth. For were he to do so he really would become an actual “enemy of the State”.

That he has failed that crucial “litmus test” means that he is just another “paper tiger” with latter-day fascists certainly deserving the type of Zionist-loving leader they now seem to increasingly follow and praise.

Haereticus
May 2018 ev
RS

This article was first published on the Reichsfolk Times invitation-only blog. We have replaced some of their internalized links with our own public ones.

°°°°°°°

{1} Fascism: “the advocacy of a particular nationalist viewpoint or form of government in a manner that seeks to ensure a certain conformity and an orderly way of life based on a particular definition of a nation and/or of a people.”

{2} https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/2017/11/14/curious-tale-stephen-lennons-charity-partnership/

{3} See this article in the Jewish Chronicle: http://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-features/131131/what-makes-edl

See also the 2017 report in The Independent newspaper where it was reported that:

“Tommy Robinson has met with members of Manchester’s Jewish community at a secretive event where he is believed to have outlined his extreme views on Islam in a speech. The former English Defence League leader is said to have talked to around a dozen members in Prestwich, just outside Manchester city centre, until the early hours of last Thursday morning.”

Update, 2019. “Tommy” has now been exposed as being financed by – to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars – by Zionists such as Daniel Pipes and Ezra Levant.

See https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/08/04/the-latest-in-the-tommy-robinson-saga/ and https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/11/05/a-modern-example-of-zionist-power/

{4} In regard to Islam and National Socialism, as Waffen-SS General Leon Degrelle said:

               “German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble ideal. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.

               That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races.” Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS (Lecture given in 1982). Reprinted in The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 441-468.

{5} The ideals of the Waffen SS – as opposed to the deluge of despicable Magian lies and propaganda about the Waffen SS – can be gleaned from the writings of Waffen SS General Leon Degrelle who was awarded numerous medals for war-time bravery including the Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves, a German military award similar to the British Victoria Cross. His writings include:

° The Eastern Front: Memoirs of a Waffen SS volunteer, 1941-1945. Institute for Historical Review. 2014. ISBN 9780939484768.

° Hitler, né à Versailles. 1–3. Paris: Art et histoire d’Europe. 1986. ISBN 2906026085.

° Ich war Gefangener. Nürnberg: Hesperos Verlag. 1944.

° Hitler pour 1000 ans. Paris: La Table Ronde. 1969.

{6} NSDAP Hauptarchiv (Institute of Contemporary History, London) HA 9/188. Copy of Deutsches Sommerfest, 7th July 1928 containing an order from Fritz Reinhardt.

°°°°°

Editorial Addendum

The term/title Haereticus is medieval Latin (from haereticalis) and means a “heretic”. The Latin word was derived from αἱρετικός, implying a decision – having the power/ability, or personally preferring/electing – “to choose”, the root of which Ancient Greek word is αἱρέω, take, capture, seize, as in the Agamemnon of Aeschylus, v.267,

               εὐάγγελος μέν, ὥσπερ ἡ παροιμία,
               ἕως γένοιτο μητρὸς εὐφρόνης πάρα.
               πεύσῃ δὲ χάρμα μεῖζον ἐλπίδος κλύειν:
               Πριάμου γὰρ ᾑρήκασιν Ἀργεῖοι πόλιν.

               It is often said that it is Dawn,
               Born from her mother, Night, who brings welcome messages.
               For you will learn of a joy greater than any you hoped to hear of:
               The Argives have captured the citadel of Priam!

and at v.1209,

               ἤδη τέχναισιν ἐνθέοις ᾑρημένη

               Had you by then been seized by the art of divine inspiration?
               

(Translated by DW Myatt)

°°°°°°°°°

Related:

Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West

Ignorant Vulgarians, Islam And Terrorism

A Necessary Dialectic
(pdf)


Some Thoughts Of Some Solitary Seeker

Order Of Nine Angles
Order Of Nine Angles

Digging and weeding the Powys soil – Nature against itself to thus create a new flowing – I find myself often and increasingly removed from this “21st Century” Western world. Not least from the curious world of the Internet, where connexions, adulation, and knowledge are saught amongst invented cyber-personae. And thus I am prompted to write following a recent visit to an online forum pertaining to LHP esoteric matters, and having read through a plethora of posts concerning that entity now often known as “O9A”.

When I became initiated into the Dark Tradition, many too many decades ago, I learned of a small collective of adults who worked quietly, hidden, and quite separate from the celebrity-ridden world of the Occult. For, refreshingly, the “Order” never really felt the need to engage with that world – more often viewing its antics with a detached amusement, or simply a non-judgemental disinterest. The few writings which existed (by today’s comparison) were non-polemical recordings with no references to anything outside of its Tradition. I may be mistaken, but back then, my understanding was of “it” existing not as an antidote or alternative/reaction to anything – but rather, a complete Way of itself.

Of course, with the onset of all things Internet, the world changed quite dramatically. The “Order” accordingly evolved – but, for good or ill? Time is still to tell, but ultimately the question is an irrelevance, being a matter only of personal taste and opinion. Today, it is interesting – sometimes – how individuals have taken the essential teachings and created new expressions of that Tradition, with this appropriating of established teachings to serve personal ends being entirely in keeping with the functionality of the Occult, both ancient and modern.

According to my online reading, a good number of these cyber-personae seem to argue over “fixing” the Order, or about “which of its teachings are now invalid” or about which teachings were fabrications to begin with. But, the ONA/O9A was only ever a recent causal invention, with a specific, temporal function: initially to esoterically bind a few individuals, and thence in its latter stages to go outwards and interact with the Occult world in general (including with its later employment of those strange abstractions “Niner”,”Drecc”, “Balobian” and so on).

       I cannot believe that the following will be a revelation to many, but I must say that the “Order of Nine Angles” is only a limited abstraction (in its conforming to the “Occult”) of something far greater – a far greater thing which contains within it elements pertaining to the Occult, but not just those elements alone. What this “greater thing” is can only really ever be apprehended in self-forgetting – but that is for another time, perhaps.

There is one aspect in particular which strikes me as interesting when reading comments by those cyber-personae. It is that the reality of this Tradition in practice, as I understand it, is in fact based on personal, direct knowledge of those who follow the Way – or at the very least, between a guide and those she or he is guiding. It is this personal (generational) transmission, as inconvenient as this may be in today’s age of convenience, which imbues the methods of the Way with Numen – with magick (and I should add, though perhaps unnecessarily, that email correspondence does not constitute personal transmission). There is no genuine “kindred” outside of this personal transmission.

My, possibly controversial, take on the matter is that whilst publication of the teachings has been of great interest to academics and occultists alike and has served to reveal the existence of an hitherto secret and self-contained Way, without this personal transmission, there cannot in fact be any basis for judging the efficacy of the methods of the Tradition.

As an aside, I would be curious to learn out of those who claim on cyber-space to be effectively following the Seven-Fold Way, how many, if any, have ventured into the land and at least undertaken the rite of External Adept? How many in this modern age would discard their mobile phone, unplug themselves from social media and undertake an ordeal such as the rite of Internal Adept? Given the age we live in, it seems that the latter rite in particular is the quintessential esoteric stand against the modern world, and is more relevant now than ever. There will be many excuses not to undertake such rites, and all those excuses will be very convincing. But I shall move on before I descend into polemic…

       If I were asked to describe the ONA/O9A, and even though my knowledge of it comes from an entirely different era, I would say that it is still an apolitical, anarchistic organisation designed to liberate the individual, and of course in the process provoke, infuriate, and contradict the conformists and power structures of society. And in addition – and perhaps most importantly – via its Labyrinthos Mythologicus, cause one or two, or more, individuals per decade (per century?) to discover that which lies beyond the mere shadow which is the form of the “O9A” itself.

Now having written all this, I recall my guide, many Summers ago, asking a rhetorical question: “Will anyone ever really know the true purpose of the Ceremony of Recalling?”

But what do I know? I am just a curmudgeon from an older time, and my reflections on the nature of the Order and Beyond are only my own – influenced and shaped as they are by those whom I knew and who came before me, and who only really told me that which they wished me to know. And with this effusion at an end, I shall crawl back under my stone (to dwell where the invasive roots are).

Some Solitary Seeker
Wales
Summer 2017


Source: http://www.o9a.org/2017/05/some-thoughts-on-the-o9a/