The Case Of Tommy Robinson: A Summary


The important points, in my view, are:

(i) that given the criminal past of “Tommy Robinson” and his behaviour he does not represent British values and in fact is in many ways the opposite of what a British nationalist leader should be;
(ii) he does not represent the values of Western civilization which values are those of reason, of chivalry, honesty, and manners, of freedom of religion and belief, and of equal and impartial justice under the law.
(iii) he is being and has been funded by Zionists and Zionist organizations and has held secret meetings with Jewish groups, and thus is little more than a Zionist muppet.

The wealthy former investment banker and former confidant of Trump, Steve Bannon, recently said – following an interview on LBC radio – that “Tommy Robinson is the backbone of this country.”

So, according to the likes of Bannon and many other supporters of Robinson the backbone of Britain is made up of violent criminals and fraudsters who are full of hatred and intolerance.

No wonder nationalist parties have failed to achieve power and no wonder they have no realistic prospect of achieving power in the near future given that they’re setting up people like Robinson as their figurehead.

Those who really are the backbone of Britain are those who embody virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

People like Robinson – and the Americans and others who now support him – are virulent in their praise of Western civilization and Western values without realizing that they themselves with their ignorance, their lack of manners, are excellent examples of the new barbarians assailing Western culture.

For what does Western culture mean to such people? Does it mean the culture of a Christian-derived humility, of chivalry and manners, of fairness, of freedom of religion, and of equal and impartial justice under the law?

No of course not, judging by the views, the behaviour, and the violent hatred of those ill-informed, uncourteous, new barbarians.

Naturally, the supporters of the new barbarians, the new type of European nationalists, would argue and have argued that the threat from Islam – and from certain types of foreigners who commit certain crimes in our lands – is so great that it over-rides chivalry, manners, fairness, and even rational logical argument.

But if you abandon the values which have made Western civilization what it is then in my opinion you’re no better than the uncivilized people you’re fighting.

Robinson and his ilk have, for example, abandoned rational logical argument committing as they do basic errors of reasoning. Thus they

                  “illogically speak and write of “Muslim rape gangs” when the reality is (i) that those belonging to such so-called “grooming gangs” are not practising Muslims who follow the Quran and Sunnah, and (ii) the fact that some or all of them may have been born into Muslim families is irrelevant, just as the fact that serial killers such as Dennis Nielson, Fritz Haarmann, and Peter Sutcliffe, may have been baptised as Christians is irrelevant in respect of their adult crimes.
                  No rational person – in this day and age – condemns Christianity on the basis that some individuals baptised as Christians are serial killers, rapists, and murderers, or have Christian-sounding names. Yet Right-Wing and alt-right leaders, ideologues, and groups, propagandistically condemn Islam on the basis that those involved in some so-called “grooming gangs” have Muslim names and/or were born into Muslim families.” {1}

The real problem is not Islam or Muslims, it’s the multicultural societies which are now the norm in almost all Western lands. The solution is not tirades and demonstrations against Islam but the creation of White-only homelands and this requires political power and which political power requires racial nationalist leaders who represent Western values and who are the best of our folk and thus whom our people can respect and trust.

Can our people – will they in their majority – trust the likes of a convicted fraudster? Of course not.

What type of person can our people respect and trust? Someone like a combat veteran, decorated for bravery. Someone like a first-responder who has undertaken practical deeds which revealed that they are a courageous individual who when in dangerous or difficult situations have placed the life of others and of their country before their own. Those are the type of people who are “the backbone of our country”, not a convicted fraudster.

It is no coincidence that Adolf Hitler – from humble beginnings – achieved what he did. For he was respected and trusted by the majority of his people because he had a Western character born from combat experience and had been decorated for bravery.

Polemicus The Younger
July 129 yf



Bankrolling A Fraudster



Media reports have now confirmed {1} what we mentioned a few days ago {2}. Which is that the criminal low-life known publicly by the alias Tommy Robinson is, given his “wealthy Zionist backers,” being supported by an eminent Queen’s Council.

The pro-Zionist Middle East Forum – founded and run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry and a virulent Islamophobe – has so far spent a five-figure sum on Tommy Robinson’s legal defence as well as “paid for foreign speakers to attend Free Tommy rallies in the UK.” {1}

In addition, former investment banker and former confidant of The Vulgarian In Chief {3}, the wealthy Steve Bannon, is reported to have said, following an interview on LBC radio, that “Tommy Robinson is the backbone of this country.”

So, according to the likes of one of the people bankrolling and supporting Mr Robinson, a convicted violent criminal, a fraudster, an Islamophobe, and drug-dealer is “the backbone” of Britain. Which statement in support of a convicted violent criminal, a fraudster, an Islamophobe, and a drug-dealer, surely says everything that needs to be said about the opinions and character of a wealthy former investment banker. No doubt Mr Bannon – following in the footsteps of The Vulgarian In Chief – will now denounce the report of his comments as “fake news”.

That Zionists and wealthy Americans are bankrolling and supporting a violent convicted criminal who has no respect for the rule of law – and trying to make him a figurehead of the Far Right in Britain – is proof positive that Mr Robinson is just a muppet: a gormless obscure puppet until the puppet becomes animated and then propagandistically hyped by others manipulating the puppet. That so many among the Far Right in Britain and elsewhere now seem to believe – as a result of such manipulation and such propaganda – that the muppet in question really is or could be “the backbone of Britain” and a suitable figurehead is surely proof enough of just how gullible such people are and just how out of touch they are with the British virtues of those who really are “the backbone of Britain” and who thus embody virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

22nd July 2018 ev




Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West

Article source:

Financing A Zionist Muppet



The mystery of who financially and logistically is backing the pro-Zionist criminal – the fraudster – known publicly by his alias “Tommy Robinson” has been solved.

It is The Middle East Forum and its wealthy supporters such as Sam Brownback who is currently a US ambassador in the administration of The Vulgarian In Chief.

The Middle East Forum is a policy institute founded and run by Daniel Pipes, an American citizen of Jewish ancestry and an Islamophobe who uncritically supports the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine. For such support and for his “Israel Victory Project” (which advocates continued Zionist domination of occupied Palestine) Pipes was presented with the Guardian of Zion Award by the Bar-Ilan University in Tel Aviv.

The Middle East Forum was “the power behind the scenes” which organized and funded the recent “Free Tommy Robinson” demonstration in London and was instrumental in funding and lobbying some 500,000 people to sign a pro-Robinson on-line petition in May of this year

That an influential, well financed, pro-Zionist American institute and its wealthy supporters are backing a British fraudster with a long history of criminal convictions {1} should come as no surprise given Robinson’s support for the Zionist entity and his febrile Islamophobia.

As we noted in a recent article {2}, the shady criminal past and personal character of “Mr Robinson” – a.k.a. Stephen Christopher Yaxley, a.k.a. Stephen Lennon, a.k.a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a.k.a. Andrew McMaster, a.k.a. Paul Harris – makes him totally unsuitable to be
                  “the figurehead of the far-right in Britain which Far Right is supposed to be, or at least once was, a movement for law and order and for and of traditional British virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.
                  That so many among the Far Right and the ‘Alt-Right’ in Britain now accept such a dishonest, ignorant, violent, impulsive, criminal as their figurehead – and rally round to support him, whatever he does, such as his recent attempt to pervert the course of justice, for which he was jailed – surely says much about what the Far Right and the ‘Alt-Right’ in Britain have seemingly become: morally bankrupt, and a negation of traditional British virtues; virtues which built and which for centuries maintained the largest civilizing Empire in human history.”

To which we would now add that those among the Far Right and the “Alt-Right” in Britain who support Mr Robinson, The Zionist Muppet, are letting themselves be manipulated by Zionists for the sake of the Zionist cause, one of the foundations of which cause is Islamophobia.

In contrast to such Zionist Islamophobia, Adolf Hitler and German National Socialists sought to co-operate with Muslims. As Waffen-SS General Leon Degrelle said:
                  “German racialism meant re-discovering the creative values of their own race, re-discovering their culture. It was a search for excellence, a noble ideal. National Socialist racialism was not against the other races, it was for its own race. It aimed at defending and improving its race, and wished that all other races did the same for themselves.
                  That was demonstrated when the Waffen SS enlarged its ranks to include 60,000 Islamic SS. The Waffen SS respected their way of life, their customs, and their religious beliefs. Each Islamic SS battalion had an imam, each company had a mullah. It was our common wish that their qualities found their highest expression. This was our racialism. I was present when each of my Islamic comrades received a personal gift from Hitler during the new year. It was a pendant with a small Koran. Hitler was honoring them with this small symbolic gift. He was honoring them with what was the most important aspect of their lives and their history. National Socialist racialism was loyal to the German race and totally respected all other races.”

Our modern racialism should do likewise, as demanded by British – by European – virtues such as fair play, decency, self-restraint, and honesty. That is, be loyal to our own kind and to our culture but respect other races and their beliefs and culture. A modern – an honourable – racialism manifest in the ethical National Socialism of Reichsfolk. {4}

129 yf

This article was first published on the Reichsfolk Times invitation-only blog. We have replaced some of their internalized links with our own public ones.


{1} The criminal past of “Mr Robinson” – who, like many criminals, has used numerous aliases over the years – includes conviction for fraud, for which he has jailed, and convictions for burglary and possession of cocaine, as well as a conviction for passport fraud, for which he was also jailed. How he acquired another passport under the alias Paul Harris and used it travel from the United States – another criminal offence – has never (to our knowledge) been investigated by the police.

{2} A Negation Of British Virtues.

{3} Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS (Lecture given in 1982). Reprinted in The Journal of Historical Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 441-468.




The Mickey Mouse Activist
A Zionist Muppet By Any Other Name
How To Spot A Zionist Muppet
About This Blog

This Is The Post-Colonial Reality



This Is The Post-Colonial Reality
A Politically Incorrect Story

In part of the former British colony of India – a part now known as Pakistan – a former Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, was arrested on his return having been convicted in absentia of “corruption” in a trial which Nawaz Sharif and many of his supporters state was engineered by the military in order to discredit him. According to one report, in a draconian (tyrannical) response to his return, the military set up road blocks while the government not only shut down mobile and internet services but also deployed thousands of officers to prevent supporters of the Sharif’s from reaching the airport. The police also arrested at least 600 workers of Mr. Sharif’s political party on “security-related” charges. Such is the modern “democracy” of such a former British colony.

Meanwhile, in the same land, a candidate in the forthcoming elections, and 127 other people, were killed by a bomb; an all-too-familiar atrocity in that part of the former British colony of India now known as Pakistan, and an atrocity ignored by most of the Western media probably because it is all too common.

Such corruption – or alleged corruption – and such draconian measures and such violence and killings are endemic in former European colonies in Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. From Rhodesia (now known as Zimbabwe) to Nigeria to South Africa to the Congo to Pakistan and beyond the price of “independence” has been political corruption, violence, killings, and often civil war and often poverty for a significant percentage of the population.

Who in the modern West mourns those 127 people killed by a bomb in modern Pakistan? Who in the modern West mourns the tens of thousands of such victims in other such lands?

Few if any because their governments are fixated on their own insular political agendas. In the case of Britain – a once mighty, civilizing, colonial power – the current fixation is on the death of one person, and the poisoning of three others, by a nerve-agent; on the desire by the current government to leave the European Union, and with a visit by The Vulgarian In Chief who lived up to his reputation as an ignorant vulgarian by declaring that Scotland was not part of the United Kingdom. {1}

Furthermore, who in the modern West can see the causal link between the corruption, violence, killings, and poverty in former European colonies and the “independence” of such colonies? Only the sagacious who were they to voice their understanding would today be most probably condemned as “reactionaries”, fascists, and “neo-Nazis”. So be it.

Meanwhile, those with first-hand experience of European colonies know the now politically-incorrect truth. Which is that European colonialism ended the corruption that had been rife in such lands; established and maintained law and order; and established societies which – compared to their past – were prosperous and free from rampant poverty and disease. Thousands upon thousands of Europeans dedicated their lives – and often gave their lives – to ensure such things.

On a personal note, I have a friend who grew up in what was then a British colony in Africa. And that during the Mau-Mau rebellion during which rebellion he had an armed guard accompany him on his daily trip by Gharry to his school {2}. Before, and after that rebellion was crushed by British forces with help from loyal natives {3} he and his family could walk the streets of a peaceful Nairobi. Today – post-independence – the streets of Nairobi are places where robberies, murder, rape, and kidnapping, are rife (4}. Similarly, in that part of the Indian subcontinent formerly ruled by Britain and now known as India, rape and gang rape and poverty are endemic.

Are we few who understand the importance of our colonial past the last of our kind, as perhaps prophetized by Jean Raspail in the novel The Camp of the Saints?

If so, what are our options? For myself, I choose the ethical National-Socialism of Reichsfolk {5} with its commitment to honour, loyalty, duty, and fairness, and which – at least to me – seems to manifest the British, the European, the traditional colonial, virtues of fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

July 2018 ev

{1} As usual the arrogant vulgarian denied he had made a mistake and (as usual) described reports of his mistake as “fake news”. Among his other recent mistakes are the following:

{2} Despite what Wikipedia and other sources currently claim, a gharry was European colonial slang for any means of transport (such as a Land Rover or “mini-bus”) that conveyed colonial Europeans from one place to another.

{3} Contemporary – politically correct – accounts invariably overlook the atrocities committed by those involved in the Mau-Mau rebellion. Just as contemporary – politically correct – accounts of the native Indian wars in the United States in the 19th century often ignore the atrocities committed by Indian tribes against European settlers: the rape and murder of women and children, the mutilation and torture and killing of men both American and Mexican. That some Europeans, and some Mexicans, responded to such atrocities with deadly force was only natural.

{4} To give just one contemporary example:




A Negation Of British Virtues