Covid-19: The Stark Reality

°°°°°°°°°

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

In regard to the Covid-19 pandemic, I have six concerns about current government policy in the UK, in the US, and elsewhere in the lands of the West.

The first is that the UK government, like many States in the US, have issued decrees which almost overnight have taken away our basic freedoms, our right to make our own decisions and act on those decisions.

The second concern is that other decrees have, again almost overnight, forced businesses to close and taken away the livelihood of many people. The result has been the unprecedented loss of our social lives and thus of the type of society we in the West have known for centuries, such as going to the Pub, going to and taking part in sporting and other outdoor events, going on holiday in our land, playing games – such as football – on a beach. Not even during two world wars was our social life curtailed in such a way, with those wars resulting in millions more deaths than are predicted from the current pandemic.

My third concern is that we as a species have survived worse pandemics in the past, like The Black Death and the 1918 pandemic, with The Black death – which was 90% fatal, unlike the relatively low 5% mortality rate of Covid-19 – being one of the causes that led to the European Renaissance and positive changes in Western society. We survived such pandemics because of three things: what is known as “community immunity”, genetics, and because such adversity aids our evolution: Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.

In terms of genetics and community immunity, some people – only a few in the case of The Black Death for example – are naturally immune, with many who are infected surviving and becoming immune and passing on their immunity to others through social contact.

My fourth concern is that the tyrannical-like decrees by Western governments and the meek compliance to such decrees by most of our folk shows how passive we as folk seem to have become, and how powerful and tyrannical our so-called “democratic” governments can be, which perhaps does not bode well for our future.

My fifth concern is that current data shows a relatively low mortality rate from Covid-19 with most who die being elderly or having underlying health problems. This data does not – at least to me – justify the panic, the constant propaganda, the FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) by the government and the media, and the tyrannical “lock down” imposed on us.

My sixth concern is that most of our folk – and even some National Socialists – seem to have forgotten or neglect the fact we have created the most civilized society ever known not by “staying safe”, not by “staying home”, but by accepting and overcoming challenges and disasters, by being defiant, and by accepting that death is a fact of life and even in some cases is or may be necessary. Every year in the UK, for example, there are around 600,000 deaths from various causes. Will there be an additional 600,000 deaths from Covid-19 in the UK? Not even the worse case scenario suggests such high mortality.

Which brings me to my final point, which is that in respect of Covid-19 governments rely on scenarios which are the result of computer models and inputted data. The accuracy of the models is unproven, and the data which is fed into the models has been selected based on certain criteria and may be inaccurate or selected on the basis of fallible assumptions. In other words, the predicted mortality rate for Covid-19 is only a current “best guess”.

Thus my answer to what might be done instead of panic, lock down, and “best guesses” is to help the sick and the dying, but allow Nature to take its course and develop community immunity, accept there will be deaths, continue with our Western, social, way of life, and move on, learning from the tragedy, and thus change, adapt, evolve. To me, this would be the National Socialist thing to do.

The harsh, the stark, reality of our human history, a reality we as a folk once accepted and was part of our ancestral tradition, is – as I noted in a previous article – “that many of us die or will die from disease, viral or otherwise; that elderly people are more prone to die from infections – viral or otherwise; that epidemics and pandemics and disease – from the Black Death to the Spanish 1918 pandemic to malaria – are a fact of Nature and a means whereby we have changed, evolved; that we can either accept the power of Nature, and who and what we are, or we can try to struggle against Nature and try to conquer Nature and believe we are fighting a war against epidemics and pandemics and disease.” {1}

It is sheer arrogance – hubris – for us to believe we can fight Nature and win. Our ancestral wisdom informs us that we should work in balance with Nature, not against it.

This working in balance with Nature is, I believe, enshrined in National Socialism and implies an acceptance of the stark, the harsh, reality of civilizations and especially the stark reality of the birth, growth, evolution of our Western civilization. If we do not accept this stark reality how can we hope to even maintain, to defend, our civilization?

The current crises has revealed how tyrannical our governments can be and now are, and how many of our folk do not know or cannot accept the harsh reality behind our Western civilization and the harsh reality needed for us to defend it, and develop it, and ourselves, further.

For my view is that it is tyranny for the government – any government – to confine most people to what is in all but name “house arrest” and to take away our centuries old liberty to, for example, go to the Pub or watch or take part in outdoor sports or other events, or travel somewhere in our land for a holiday, or play a game of football on a beach.

Our governments have now shown that they have total power – they command what we do and where we go, ultimately on pain of imprisonment if we don’t pay the fines imposed by the police for breaking what the government has commanded. Their commands have totally disrupted our Western societies in an unprecedented way.

It has also shown just how meek and tame we as a folk seem to have become. That there is a meek compliance to such government decrees by most of our folk shows how passive we as folk have become. Would Vikings, would the Anglo-Saxons, would the Kelts, would Germanic tribes, have embraced such a message as “stay safe at home” and obeyed their tyrannical overlords? Would they have been bothered by deaths from disease, viral or otherwise, to the extent of staying meekly in their dwellings? Or would they have accepted that death – from disease or from war or from other causes – is a natural and necessary fact of human life and thus continue to live, and to fight, according to ancestral custom?

Thus, the question really is: what have we, as a folk, now become or are becoming?

D.L.
April 2020 ev

{1} https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/covid-19-update/

°°°°°°°
Article source:
https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2020/04/17/the-harsh-reality/

°°°°°°°


An Icon Of Nihilism?

°°°°°°°°°

David Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

Myatt: Icon Of Nihilism?

The French author Bertrand Vergely – who teaches at the Institute of Political Studies in Paris – wrote in his 2019 book Notre vie a un sens: Une sagesse contre le pessimisme ambiant, that his “philosophy of Pathei-Mathos [is] probably very close to that of David Myatt – an inflammatory reference according to [modern] dogma…..” {1}

That Vergely has borrowed Myatt’s phrase “philosophy of pathei-mathos” (a term used by Myatt from 2011) and mentioned that even referencing Myatt is an inflammatory thing to do, is interesting. As is the attempt by Vergely to distance “his” philosophy from Myatt’s by stating he does not endorse either some of the things that Myatt once endorsed (and has since rejected) or which Myatt’s enemies have accused him of endorsing.

Interesting because it reveals a progressive awareness of Myatt’s philosophy, and because of how propaganda about and rumours concerning Myatt – for example, by anti-fascist groups – have not only increased in recent years but also been believed by thousands upon thousands of people even through there is no evidence – nothing probative – to support such propaganda and rumours, leading rational folk to conclude that such believers and such anti-fascist propagandists are biased and prejudiced.

Biased and prejudiced because they have not bothered to read Myatt’s extensive post-2011 writings about his rejection of extremism {2} and his extensive post-2011 writings about his philosophy of pathei-mathos with its foundations of empathy, compassion, and humility, {3} or if they have bothered to read a few them they have dismissed them as the deceptive work of a Trickster, of an “evil mastermind”, with the result that David Myatt now seems to be perceived as an iconoclast and is progressing to become a modern icon for heretical rebellion against the capitalist West, for antinomianism, and for nihilism.

Richard Stirling
March 2020

{1} “Ceci dit ma philosophie du Pathei-Mathos (sans doute très proche de celle de David Myatt – une référence sulfureuse according to the dogma)
{2} See for example Understanding and Rejecting Extremism, and his Extremism And Reformation.
{2} See for example The Numinous Way Of Pathei-Mathos and Religion, Empathy, and Pathei-Mathos.

°°°°°°°
Article Source:
https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2020/03/13/a-progressive-awareness/
Image Credit:
David Myatt in 2003

°°°°°°°


Fallacies Of Anti-O9A Propaganda

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

°°°°°°°°°

As mentioned in previous articles, the propaganda about the Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA) written and distributed by a political advocacy group is riddled with errors {1} and reveals the astonishing lack of knowledge about the O9A by that political advocacy group; a lack which is either deliberate – arising from hatred and prejudice – or arising because of a desire to spread propaganda about one of their declared enemies.

The propaganda also reveals the author committing several logical fallacies; either from ignorance or because of hatred and prejudice and/or from a desire to spread propaganda about a declared enemy.

Some examples of such fallacies are:

° In respect of the O9A, in their 2019 so-called “Sate of hate” report, and in their 2020 report, the author commits the logical fallacy of Incomplete Evidence by selectively quoting from some O9A material, ignoring other material which provides context or which contradicts such quotations, and quoting material authored by some of those who associate themselves with the Occult movement that is the O9A.

Thus most of the O9A corpus is ignored, since a study of that corpus (i) would have contradicted their claim that the O9A is neo-nazi, {2} {3} (ii) revealed the context for suggested Insight Roles, which is a short part of the third stage of the decades long Seven Fold Way; (iii) revealed the fundamental O9A principle of individual authority, {4} and (iv) contradicted their claim that the O9A encourage misogyny and rape. {5}

° In the same report the author commits the fallacy of secundum quid et simpliciter. Which is the use of particular individual cases to form a general rule to then use that rule to describe, and thence to blame, or to castigate, or to defame a whole group. In many instances this involves quoting from material authored by some of those who associate themselves with the Occult movement that is the O9A.

° In the 2020 report the author commits the fallacy of argumentum ad verecundiam – argument from authority – by repeating what certain others have said or written about the O9A, with it being obvious from the errors made in that and the 2019 report and from the committal of the foregoing two other fallacies, that the author is not an authority on the subject of O9A esoteric theory and praxises.

° In both reports the author commits a fallacy of presumption by making conclusions based on their assumptions and claim; in addition to which the author provides no evidence – nothing probative – for their assumptions and claims, such as in the matter of Mr Myatt being Anton Long, and which assumptions and claims often derive from the foregoing three fallacies.

The propagandistic nature of the reports can thus be seen, for the biased and misleading information they contain has been systematically disseminated in order to promote a political cause.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev

Notes

{1} See the text titled Exposing Twelve Basic Errors available at https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/how-to-spread-fake-news/.

For an esoteric understanding of the O9A, refer to the 300 page Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy, which is available at https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

{2} See the chapter The Alleged National Socialism Of The O9A in The Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy. The article quotes from letters by Anton Long sent to Michael Aquino and others in the early 1990s, letters which were published in 1992.

{3} See also Order Of Nine Angles: The Deofel Quintet, included in Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy, where it is explained that The Deofel Quintet (written between 1976 and the early 1990’s) places the neo-nazism aspect into the necessary esoteric perspective, for the novels of the Deofel Quintet are non-political.

{4} The principle is explained in the two articles Authority, Learning, and Culture, In O9A Tradition (written in 2013) and The Authority Of Individual Judgement: Interpretation And Meaning (written in 2014). Both articles are included in The Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy.

The axiom of the authority of individual judgement means that each O9A person, nexion, group, or cell, are – with one important exception – free to develop their own interpretation of everything O9A, free to develop and change everything O9A, and that there is no authority above the individual, or beyond each group or collective of groups. No O9A leader, no outer (or inner) ‘representative’, no council, no ‘old guard’, who can make pronouncements about or declare what is or is not correct. No ‘official’ or ‘genuine’ O9A; no ‘heresy’; no proscription of individuals or groups. Furthermore, no consensus is necessary or required among those who are or who associate with the O9A {2}, although naturally a particular O9A nexion may have or arrive at a particular internal consensus and thus presence a particular interpretation of matters O9A.

{5} The O9A consider rapists as suitable candidates for culling: see for example the text Culling And The Code of Kindred Honour (written 2015) available at https://omega9alpha.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/culling-o9a-code-v3.pdf

The pro-Sapphic novel Breaking The Silence Down – written in 1985 and part of The Deofel Quintet – and the essay The Anti-Patriarchal O9A Ethos – written in 2017 and available at https://omega9alpha.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/o9a-questions-2017-v5b.pdf – reveals the O9A attitude toward women, with the O9A code of kindred honour embodying respect for women and gender equality.

°°°°°°°°°


An Occult Phantom Menace

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

°°°°°°°°°

An Occult Phantom Menace
Part Thirty Seven

O9A: The Occult Phantom Menace
(pdf, Second Edition)

Contents:

Preface
Introduction
Exposing Twelve Basic Errors
More Anti-Fascist Propaganda About The O9A
An Ignorance Regarding The O9A
The Fallacies Of Anti-O9A Propaganda
Banning The O9A
Demonizing Mr Myatt
Culling And The Code of Kindred Honour
Another Academic Misinterpretation Of The O9A
The Question Of O9A Culling
Appendix: Magick And Politics

°°°°°°°

This compilation is of articles and texts which provide “the O9A side of the story” in relation to the accusations made about the O9A (Order of Nine Angles) and the propaganda spread regarding the O9A in two reports, published in 2019 and 2020, by a political advocacy group, and which group is currently (March 2020) trying to get the O9A banned by the British government.

The articles and texts reveal the astonishing lack of knowledge about the O9A by that political advocacy group; a lack which is either deliberate – arising from hatred and prejudice – or arising because of a desire to spread propaganda about one of their declared enemies.

Unlike the anti-O9A propaganda spread by that political advocacy group and its minions, the articles and texts in the compilation give detailed references to O9A works and other sources.

It really does seem that a political advocacy group – and over 10,000 people who have (as of March 10, 2020) signed their petition to ban the O9A – really do believe that the O9A is The Occult Phantom Menace.

°°°°°°°°°


The Demonizing Of Mr Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Editorial Note: We republish here a recent article about the O9A and the attempt by a certain anti-fascist group to have the O9A banned – proscribed – as a terrorist group. As the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group states in his “on-line petition”,

[quote]
            We, the undersigned, are writing to you with concern over the Nazi-Satanic group ‘Order of Nine Angles’ and call on you to use the powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 to proscribe them as a terrorist group. […]

           The Order of Nine Angles (O9A) seeks to overthrow the alleged “Nazarene/Magian” (Jewish) influence on society by subverting and destabilising society through both chaos and terrorism. It is the most extreme Satanist group in the world and is having an increasing influence on a generation of young nazis who are being drawn into terrorist activity.” Source: https://action.hopenothate.org.uk/page/signup/proscribe-the-order-of-nine-angles
[/quote]

He also states that the O9A is

[quote]
           a British neo-Nazi satanist group that encourages extreme violence among its followers to destabilise society, and overthrow what it sees as Jewish control of global culture and economics.
[/quote]

That they have, to date, over 5000 signatures – including members of the British Parliament – is indicative of how the O9A is now perceived among mundanes.

However, as the following article mentions: “From the perspective of the Order of Nine Angles (ONA, O9A) this is all marvelous propaganda, and may well have Levey-type Satanists envious and desirous of penning even more anti-O9A diatribes.”

°°°°°°°°°

The Demonizing Of Mr Myatt

With the publication in March 2020 of a report by the left-wing political advocacy group calling itself Hope Not Hate, the demonizing of Mr Myatt {1} has reached a new level especially as the “chief executive” of that political advocacy group has, since the publication of that report, ranted about Mr Myatt on an internet audio forum where he, for almost half an hour, repeated his baseless accusations against the O9A. {2}

In that rant he stated, among other things, that Myatt became a Satanist in 1966 and that National Socialism was and is integral to the O9A; that the O9A advocates sexual violence; that in a March 2000 during an interview Myatt carried an SS dagger in the pocket of his Barbour jacket, and handed him a three page document concerning the Rules of Dueling. He also repeated the claim that if someone O9A could not find a suitable human opfer for culling they would sacrifice and animal. He also speaks of O9A supporters as having established groups on encrypted internet platforms such as Telegram which encourage violence and terrorism. He also claimed that the now banned Sonnenkrieg Division was an O9A network; that Myatt in the 1970s in Leeds did deeds of random violence including attacking homeless people; that in the late 1970s Myatt joined Colin Jordan’s British Movement, and that the O9A is the most extreme cult in the world and “has to be stopped”.

From the perspective of the Order of Nine Angles (ONA, O9A) this is all marvelous propaganda, and may well have Levey-type Satanists envious and desirous of penning even more anti-O9A diatribes.

In respect of Mr Myatt, the portrait presented by the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group is of Myatt as “an evil mastermind” whose raison d’etre is encouraging terrorism by whatever means. Kudos therefore to that “chief executive” who in his hatred has neglected Myatt’s voluminous post-2011 about rejecting extremism and neglected Myatt’s philosophy of pathei-mathos {3} and who thus has made Myatt into a modern icon of rebellion, Antinomianism, Satanism, and terrorism.

              However, for the sake of historical accuracy, we shall correct a few – note: only a few – of the many mistakes that the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group made in his audio rant.

° In 1966 and for most of 1997 Myatt was a schoolboy living in Singapore. He thus could not then have become a Satanist as the “chief executive” alleges.

There is nothing probative – no evidence – that Myatt became a Satanist in the late 1960s. There is only the fictitious forgery titled Diablerie.

° National Socialism is not and never was integral to the O9A, as a perusal of such O9A texts as The Seven Fold Path explains.

° The O9A has never advocated sexual violence, as a perusal of the O9A corpus would reveal. Indeed, the O9A has issued texts denouncing misogyny and rape: see for example Fake News.

° As noted elsewhere Myatt never carried an SS dagger in the pocket of his Barbour jacket {4}, but once did admit to sometimes carrying a .22 Bersa semi-automatic pistol.

° There is no three page document written by or circulated by Myatt concerning the Rules of Dueling. What exists is a short one-page statement by Myatt which we reproduce here:

[quote]
             “The most acceptable and civilized form of duel is by pistol, and those abiding by the Code of Honour are expected to use this form as and when necessary.

              A formal challenge to a duel must be personally issued, by one party to the other, at which a date, time and place are specified (Dawn is traditionally favoured). Each duellist must be accompanied by a Second, to ensure fair play and an honourable outcome, as there must be a referee.

              At the appointed time and in the appointed place, two revolvers, pistols or duelling pistols, as similar as possible, are checked and prepared by the referee, (ideally a man of honour should keep or have access to a matched pair of pistols specifically made for duelling, capable of firing one round and one round only). These revolvers or pistols, and the bullets, are also checked by the duellists and their seconds. [Note: whatever pistol is used it should be loaded or so adapted that one round and only one round can be discharged from it when the trigger is pulled.]

              The referee then allows the duellists to choose a weapon. The duellists stand back to back. At a sign or word from the referee they then walk a set number of paces agreed beforehand (ten being usual) before turning to face each other. The referee then says: “Take aim!” at which they take aim. The referee then says: “Fire!” at which they discharge the weapon. It is considered dishonourable conduct to aim and/or fire before the referee gives the signal to so do.

              Should one person fire and miss, or hit and injure, the other duellist before that duellist has also fired, then the person who has so fired must wait, without moving, until his fellow duellist has also fired, if he is capable of so firing.

              Honour is satisfied if the duel is undertaken in the above manner.

Some Notes On Duelling

              There are four things which need to be understood about personal duels of honour.
              (1) The etiquette, or rules, of duelling must be followed, for it is these rules which make this encounter between two individuals a civilized and thus an honourable encounter. A duel of honour is not a brawl, or merely a fight between two individuals – it is a dispassionate meeting of two individuals who use their own will, their own strength of character, to fight in a particular way.
              The rules, the etiquette, of duelling make it such a dispassionate encounter – for a duel is a test of courage, of nerve, of character, of personal honour itself. Any and all conduct which is against the rules is dishonourable, and as such the person who does not abide by the rules is not an honourable person, and thus forfeits their honour and their honourable reputation.

              If the rules are not followed, it is thus not a duel of honour.

              (2) In a duel of honour, deadly weapons must be used. It is the deadly nature of the weapons used, with the possibility of death, which makes the encounter an honourable one. Deadly weapons include pistols, swords and long-bladed fighting knives of the Bowie type.
              (3) The duel is a private affair between the two individuals concerned. As such, only the nominated Seconds, and a referee – acceptable by both sides – must be present. It is against the etiquette of duelling for any other people to be present.

              (4) A person challenged to a duel must either personally accept the challenge, or decline the challenge. It is dishonourable and cowardly conduct to ignore a challenge once it has been formally issued. If a person who is challenged declines the challenge, then they must issue a personal apology, and if necessary, or called upon to do so, a public apology.
              A man of honour will only challenge to a duel those individuals whom he believes can physically defend themselves and their honour with deadly weapons. Thus, it is dishonourable and cowardly if someone who is challenged to a duel tries to get someone else to fight the duel on their behalf.”

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20090607223524/http://www.cosmicbeing.info/duel.html

[/quote]

° Myatt joined Colin Jordan’s British Movement in 1968, not in the late 1970s.

° The allegation that “if someone O9A could not find a suitable human opfer for culling they would sacrifice an animal” is laughable given that no O9A text mentions this and that O9A texts clearly state that they abhor animal sacrifice since there is an abundance of human dross who could be sacrificed, qv. R. Parker, Praxis and Theory of The Order of Nine Angles – A Précis for Critics, Neophytes, and Academics. 2012.

° There is nothing probative to indicate that Myatt in the 1970s in Leeds did deeds of random violence.

Conclusion

That journalists and others who repeat the allegations and lies made by the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group without ever having perused O9A texts such as The Seven Fold Path and without having studied Myatt’s post-2011 writings surely indicates something about those journalists and those others.

That the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group does not, in his 2020 or 2019 reports or in his audio rant or in his conversations with journalists and others, mention Myatt’s voluminous post-2011 writings about rejecting extremism and Myatt’s post-2012 philosophy of pathei-mathos is both interesting and indicative.

Has the “chief executive” even read those writings? Probably not.

What is his comment, for example, on Myatt’s article A Balanced View Of Islam and The West and his books Extremism And Reformation, and A Rejection Of Extremism.

If the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group has indeed bothered to read such post-2011 writings by Myatt, is the “chief executive” in his fanaticism and prejudice under the delusion that such writings are the work of “an evil mastermind” and thus designed to deceive?

Failure by him to provide answers to such questions is not an option. For if he believes such a delusion that such writings are designed to deceive, then surely it expresses something about the psyche of “chief executive”, about his own physis, about his character, and about his own personal and political agenda.

Furthermore, that the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group does not mention the rumours that Myatt may, for decades, have been either working for “Special Branch” or be or have been an MI5 agent provocateur {5} is also interesting and indicative. Is the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group hyping Myatt so that Myatt can continue to be a State-sponsored agent provocateur and be seen by others as an icon of rebellion, antinomianism, Satanism, and terrorism?

Rachael Stirling
March 2020
v1.03

{1} For earlier attempts to demonize Myatt see https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2019/05/11/demonizing-david-myatt/

{2} See for example https://omega9alpha.wordpress.com/fake-news/

{3} Refer to https://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/dwm-rejecting-extremism-v3.pdf and also https://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/reformation-extremism-v3b.pdf

{4} https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/meeting-with-nick-lowles/

{5} See for example (i) https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/agent-provocateur/ and (ii) https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/undercover-spies/

°°°°°°°


Obsessed With David Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

O9A

°°°°°°°°°

It is now apparent that the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group – a Maltese immigrant to England, a Zionist lover, and a recipient of money from Jewish billionaire George Soros – is obsessed both with a certain Mr Myatt and with the Occult movement, the anarchist sub-culture, the O9A, which the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group alleges Myatt created and is still a part of.

Hence his March 2020 (and libelous) rant on the “buzzsprout” media platform; {1} his desire to see that Occult movement banned as a “terrorist organization”; and his lies and disinformation and allegations about both that Occult movement and about Mr Myatt. {2}

That his lies and disinformation and allegations are and have been blandly repeated by the Media is indicative of the nature of the modern Media given that the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group has presented nothing probative to support his lies, his disinformation and his allegations.

A while ago we challenged the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group to provide actual evidence, and even mentioned an active e-mail address where we might be contacted {3}.

Of course he neither provided actual evidence nor contacted us. Which reaffirmed to us and others his hateful, prejudiced, and hypocritical, nature: in public, he presents himself as a champion of “hope not hate” while he continues to not only make allegations about those he personally dislikes, and is prejudiced against, but also fails to provide actual evidence for his malicious allegations. {4}

As we previously asked of him:

[quote]
             “in regard to your allegations about the Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA) have you studied the O9A corpus and such texts as the 300 page Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy? {5} If not, then your views about the O9A are – it seems to us, et al – as prejudiced as your views about Myatt.”
[/quote]

As Mr Myatt was fond of quoting: Δίκα δὲ τοῖς μὲν παθοῦσιν μαθεῖν ἐπιρρέπει, [The Goddess] Fairness favours someone learning from adversity.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev
v. 1.03

{1} Update, March 13, 2020: He repeats his pernicious allegations – for which, yet again, he provides no evidence, on a video uploaded to the Facebook page of his political advocacy group.

{2} One pernicious allegation that the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group regurgitates is that of “cat strangler”, which Myatt has many times refuted: see, for example, p. 217 of the book Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right edited by Jeffrey S. Kaplan and published in 2000.

See also https://web.archive.org/web/20091130205840/http://www.davidmyatt.ws/rumors-about-myatt.html which includes the following:

[quote]
“There is a lot of disinformation about me on the Internet and in various books; and many unsubstantiated rumours…

In such matters, the principle of personal honour applies, for an honourable person would either ignore such disinformation, rumours and allegations, or seek to ask, in person and in private, the individual who is the subject of such things. This is the honourable thing to do, the gentlemanly and lady-like thing to do, and those who do not do this – for whatever reason and from whatever motive – are acting dishonourably… Unfortunately, in these un-numinous times we live in and endure, people of manners – those who behave in a gentlemanly and lady-like way – are a minority…

Thus, in many ways, such rumours and allegations about me are a good test of a person’s character: of their honour and their loyalty…”
[/quote]

In addition, both the police and the RSPCA interviewed Myatt in 1974 shortly after the allegation of animal cruelty was made in a local newspaper, with both the Police and the RSPCA concluding that the allegation was pure journalistic invention, a smear designed to discredit Myatt, who at the time was heavily-involved in the notoriously violent neo-nazi group, the NDFM, and who had, the previous year, been released from prison after serving a prison sentence for violence.

That the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group regurgitates such an old and discredited allegation makes one wonder if he was one of the MOACs [Myatt Obsessed Anonymous Cowards] who trolled the internet over a decade ago making allegations about Myatt.

In regard to that 1974 newspaper article, Myatt wrote – in his Towards Identity and the Galactic Empire: Autobiographical Notes, Part One, dated JD2452991.767, that it,

[quote]
“made sensational claims about me. I had in my naivety decided to give an interview (my first) with a journalist to talk about our new NS movement, the NDFM. I briefly mentioned how it might be possible for chaos to be created by subversive means, and subversive groups, as a prelude to a revolution which an NS movement could take advantage of, just as I made one passing reference to having a theoretical interest in “the Occult” and to having considered investigating it further. The journalist promised to let me read his final copy before it was published and several photographs of me were taken, with him suggesting I hold something to do with the Occult, which I again naively did. Our conversation lasted for about half an hour, during which he took a few notes (it was not recorded).

I assumed in my innocence that he would simply recount what I had said. Of course he neither showed me the article before publication, nor printed what I said, except for one short sentence about causing chaos. The whole article was a fabrication, designed to be sensationalist and to discredit me. This whole episode was to be a very interesting, worthwhile, experience for me: a learning from experience, as Aeschylus wrote.” Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20040419193109/http://www.geocities.com/davidmyatt/notes1.html
[/quote]

{3} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/12/01/open-letter-to-nick-lowles/

{4} In respect of his lies and disinformation and allegations see https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/how-to-spread-fake-news/

{5} https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

°°°°°°°°°


Banning The O9A: Update

°°°°°°°°°

Chant To Return Atazoth

°°°°°°°°°

According to a recent “twitter” post by Louise Haigh – Member of Parliament for Sheffield Heeley and Shadow Policing & Crime Minister – “the government must move to proscribe the Order of Nine Angles as a terror group. Their beliefs and tactics are horrific and they pose the most extreme danger imaginable”.

A danger so evident – apparently – in the latest O9A work titled The Seofonfeald Paeth (pdf) with its dangerous and horrific texts such as (i) The Esoteric Learning Presenced Through Pathei-Mathos, (ii) Esoteric Note On The Somnium Scipionis Of Cicero, (iii) The Acausal And ὁ θεός, and of course the extremist text The Place of Empathy in the Esoteric Tradition of the Order of Nine Angles.

What is evident is that Establishment critics such as Louise Haigh and Yvette Cooper – who is also a Member of Parliament – have never taken the trouble to read O9A works such as The Seofonfeald Paeth. Instead, they rely on the fake news, the disinformation, the accusations, and the lies, propagated by the likes of The Poison Dwarf and his anti-fascist associates at Hate Not Hope. {1}

This, therefore, is what the land of Britain has now apparently been reduced to: persons in positions of power and influence parroting the propaganda of political special interest groups and unwilling or unable to take the time and trouble to do their own detailed research and then as a result of such research draw their own conclusions about the topic or about a group or about a person. Do not do so is prejudice by any other name. Should they be ashamed of themselves for not undertaking such research? Yes.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev

{1} https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2019/02/21/full-of-hate-not-hope/

°°°°°°°°°


Hyping The O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Hyping The O9A
Anti-Fascist Propaganda And The Sinister Dialectic

For many years many of the anti-O9A crowd, and followers of the Levey (mis)interpretation of Satanism, accused “us” – we who associate ourselves with the sub-culture that is the O9A – of hyping both the O9A and a certain Mr Myatt.

As some of “us” pointed out, years ago, there is no need whatsoever for anyone of us to hype Mr Myatt, for his exeatic life – when objectively studied – is sufficient of itself to show how much he differs from the much-hyped Howard Stanton Levey. {1}

There is and was no need for “us” to hype the Order of Nine Angles since anti-fascists – and especially the hypocrite and propagandist, the non-English immigrant and Zionist, known as The Poison Dwarf – have brought the O9A unprecedented Media attention.

As witness the latest anti-fascist wheeze to get the O9A banned in Britain as “a terrorist” group. {2} A wheeze which has generated Media attention, led to an unprecedented download of O9A texts, and has even gotten Yvette Cooper, Member of Parliament and chairwoman of the Home Affairs select committee, to declare that the British Home Secretary “should immediately” refer the ONA to the government’s proscription review group.

This attention, and the casting of the O9A as the “world’s most extreme far-right terror group,” {3} not only works to “our” advantage but is also a natural part of our “sinister dialectic”.

To our advantage because the publicity will draw to “us” – to our anti-Magian esoteric philosophy {4} and to our Vindex mythos {5} – more like-minded supporters, since as someone once wrote:

[quote]
             “In my own life, I have tried to create some things which can disrupt our societies and which can lead to the creation of strong, really dangerous, ruthless individuals – some things which are so subversive that no laws could ever outlaw them, and that attempts to restrain them, to outlaw them, would only make them more attractive to some individuals.”
[/quote]

A natural part of our sinister dialectic because (i) such anti-O9A propagandists are still in thrall to causal abstractions and thus in thrall to the masculous dialectic of conflicting opposites, such as “fascist and non-fascist” and “nazi and liberal” and so on, {6} and because (ii) we and others, over centuries, have expounded what is beyond such a dialectic and what praxis or experiences or learning (pathei-mathos) can evolve us as individuals beyond such causal abstractions. A learning evident, for example, in the decades-long O9A Seven Fold Way. {7}

However, “we” are aware that all this will only be understood, in our era, by a few: by the Occult cognoscenti, by “our” Adepts, and by those who, like some artists and musicians and creative writers, resonate with our sinister-numinous aesthetic.

Meanwhile we remain The Occult Phantom Menace.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev

{1} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2017/01/07/suspicious-propaganda/

See also https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/02/22/a-satanic-icon/

{2} https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51682760

See also https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/calls-for-neo-nazi-satanist-group-to-be-banned-as-terrorist-organisation/

{3} https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/02/worlds-far-right-terror-group-still-active-uk-12334019/

{4} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/traditional-and-modern-the-two-types-of-satanism/

{5} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/09/25/vindex-mythos-and-logos/

{6} Refer to (i) https://regardingdavidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/myatt-philos-in-real-life.pdf and (ii) https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/o9a-heretical-dialectics-v5.pdf

See also https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/beyond-satanism/

{7} qv. https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

°°°°°°°°°


Heretical Dialectics

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

O9A: Heretical Dialectics
(pdf)
Second Edition

°°°

Contents:

° Preface
° A Powerful And Influential Zionist Myth
° Reichsfolk: A New Interpretation Of National Socialism
° Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West
° Redefining Anti-Semitism: A Tale For Our Times
° Remembering The German Holocaust
° Holocaust Denial Will Not Be Tolerated
° The Vulgarian: Gift From Our Goddess
° The Vulgarian: Archetypal Homo Hubris
° The Vulgarian
° More Anti-Fascist Lies
° More Journalistic Propaganda
° Ignorance Regarding The O9A
° Appendix: The Satanism Of The O9A

°°°

The compilation is a small selection of articles originally published on our blog in the past few years, and which articles deal – in a currently unpopular and dialectical way – with certain modern heresies and/or which present a heretical (and occasionally an Occult) view about some current events and/or about certain people such as The Vulgarian, the current [2020] President of Amerika.

By the term dialectic we mean one or both of the following:

(i) characterized by the existence or operation of opposing forces, tendencies, opinions, etcetera; the tension and disputes produced by the clash of such forces, opinions, etcetera; and the revealing of truth (the insight) that can result from such tension, disputes, and clashes;

(ii) a disputant who disputes to be transgressive and/or to be heretical (antinomian) and/or to engender a dialectical response.

Given the misunderstanding about what the O9A mean by ‘satanism’ we have included here an Appendix which briefly describes the O9A view; a view evident in the recently published 300 page collection titled Seofonfeald Paeth Trilogy which is available both as a gratis open access pdf document from https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf and in printed form in three books: (i) Feond, ISBN 978-1687255624; (ii) Baeldraca, ISBN 978-1689931953; and (iii) Tyberness, ISBN 978-1696821742

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
February 2020 ev

°°°°°°°°°


The Magian United Nations

odal3

°°°°°°°°°

The United Nations: The Sly Magian at Work
(pdf)

°°°°°

The article titled The United Nations: The Sly Magian at Work although undated was, on the evidence contained in the article, written by David Myatt in 2003 or 2004 not long after the invasion of Iraq by NATO forces.

The article was included in Seven Essays Concerning The Vindex Mythos and which work was undated but was distributed by Reichsfolk in 2004 and included early drafts of parts of The Mythos of Vindex. {1}

What may be relevant is that The United Nations: The Sly Magian at Work was issued during Myatt’s notorious campaign to, as a Muslim, bring National Socialists and radical Muslims together; a campaign well-described in Professor Michael’s book The Enemy of My Enemy, {2} with Michael noting that Myatt has “arguably done more than any other theorist to develop a synthesis of the extreme right and Islam.” {3}

Myatt’s polemical article The United Nations: The Sly Magian at Work – and its appendix, Concerning UNDP, UNHCR, UNESCO & UNICEF – thus belongs to that campaign when he often spelled America in a Muslim way as either Amerika or Amrika, and in which article he heretically describes the Taliban as “honourably resisting the occupation of their land.”

It thus appears that the article was designed to appeal to both National Socialists and Muslims while containing important truths about the Magian ethos, about the hubriati, and about the modern West, which are still relevant today.

Richard Stirling
November 2019

{1} The Mythos of Vindex – the final draft of which was completed by Myatt around 2004/2005 – was finally published by Reichsfolk in 2016 and is available, as of November 2019, from https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/myatt-mythos-of-vindex-v1.pdf

See also Myatt’s earlier Vindex: Destiny Of The West, with a facsimile of the first printed edition available at https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/myatt-vindex.pdf

{2} Michael, George. (2006) The Enemy of My Enemy: The Alarming Convergence of Militant Islam and the Extreme Right. University Press of Kansas.

{3} Op. cit. p.142

°°°°°°°°°