An Occult Phantom Menace

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

°°°°°°°°°

An Occult Phantom Menace
Part Thirty Seven

O9A: The Occult Phantom Menace
(pdf, Second Edition)

Contents:

Preface
Introduction
Exposing Twelve Basic Errors
More Anti-Fascist Propaganda About The O9A
An Ignorance Regarding The O9A
The Fallacies Of Anti-O9A Propaganda
Banning The O9A
Demonizing Mr Myatt
Culling And The Code of Kindred Honour
Another Academic Misinterpretation Of The O9A
The Question Of O9A Culling
Appendix: Magick And Politics

°°°°°°°

This compilation is of articles and texts which provide “the O9A side of the story” in relation to the accusations made about the O9A (Order of Nine Angles) and the propaganda spread regarding the O9A in two reports, published in 2019 and 2020, by a political advocacy group, and which group is currently (March 2020) trying to get the O9A banned by the British government.

The articles and texts reveal the astonishing lack of knowledge about the O9A by that political advocacy group; a lack which is either deliberate – arising from hatred and prejudice – or arising because of a desire to spread propaganda about one of their declared enemies.

Unlike the anti-O9A propaganda spread by that political advocacy group and its minions, the articles and texts in the compilation give detailed references to O9A works and other sources.

It really does seem that a political advocacy group – and over 10,000 people who have (as of March 10, 2020) signed their petition to ban the O9A – really do believe that the O9A is The Occult Phantom Menace.

°°°°°°°°°


The Demonizing Of Mr Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Editorial Note: We republish here a recent article about the O9A and the attempt by a certain anti-fascist group to have the O9A banned – proscribed – as a terrorist group. As the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group states in his “on-line petition”,

[quote]
            We, the undersigned, are writing to you with concern over the Nazi-Satanic group ‘Order of Nine Angles’ and call on you to use the powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 to proscribe them as a terrorist group. […]

           The Order of Nine Angles (O9A) seeks to overthrow the alleged “Nazarene/Magian” (Jewish) influence on society by subverting and destabilising society through both chaos and terrorism. It is the most extreme Satanist group in the world and is having an increasing influence on a generation of young nazis who are being drawn into terrorist activity.” Source: https://action.hopenothate.org.uk/page/signup/proscribe-the-order-of-nine-angles
[/quote]

He also states that the O9A is

[quote]
           a British neo-Nazi satanist group that encourages extreme violence among its followers to destabilise society, and overthrow what it sees as Jewish control of global culture and economics.
[/quote]

That they have, to date, over 5000 signatures – including members of the British Parliament – is indicative of how the O9A is now perceived among mundanes.

However, as the following article mentions: “From the perspective of the Order of Nine Angles (ONA, O9A) this is all marvelous propaganda, and may well have Levey-type Satanists envious and desirous of penning even more anti-O9A diatribes.”

°°°°°°°°°

The Demonizing Of Mr Myatt

With the publication in March 2020 of a report by the left-wing political advocacy group calling itself Hope Not Hate, the demonizing of Mr Myatt {1} has reached a new level especially as the “chief executive” of that political advocacy group has, since the publication of that report, ranted about Mr Myatt on an internet audio forum where he, for almost half an hour, repeated his baseless accusations against the O9A. {2}

In that rant he stated, among other things, that Myatt became a Satanist in 1966 and that National Socialism was and is integral to the O9A; that the O9A advocates sexual violence; that in a March 2000 during an interview Myatt carried an SS dagger in the pocket of his Barbour jacket, and handed him a three page document concerning the Rules of Dueling. He also repeated the claim that if someone O9A could not find a suitable human opfer for culling they would sacrifice and animal. He also speaks of O9A supporters as having established groups on encrypted internet platforms such as Telegram which encourage violence and terrorism. He also claimed that the now banned Sonnenkrieg Division was an O9A network; that Myatt in the 1970s in Leeds did deeds of random violence including attacking homeless people; that in the late 1970s Myatt joined Colin Jordan’s British Movement, and that the O9A is the most extreme cult in the world and “has to be stopped”.

From the perspective of the Order of Nine Angles (ONA, O9A) this is all marvelous propaganda, and may well have Levey-type Satanists envious and desirous of penning even more anti-O9A diatribes.

In respect of Mr Myatt, the portrait presented by the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group is of Myatt as “an evil mastermind” whose raison d’etre is encouraging terrorism by whatever means. Kudos therefore to that “chief executive” who in his hatred has neglected Myatt’s voluminous post-2011 about rejecting extremism and neglected Myatt’s philosophy of pathei-mathos {3} and who thus has made Myatt into a modern icon of rebellion, Antinomianism, Satanism, and terrorism.

              However, for the sake of historical accuracy, we shall correct a few – note: only a few – of the many mistakes that the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group made in his audio rant.

° In 1966 and for most of 1997 Myatt was a schoolboy living in Singapore. He thus could not then have become a Satanist as the “chief executive” alleges.

There is nothing probative – no evidence – that Myatt became a Satanist in the late 1960s. There is only the fictitious forgery titled Diablerie.

° National Socialism is not and never was integral to the O9A, as a perusal of such O9A texts as The Seven Fold Path explains.

° The O9A has never advocated sexual violence, as a perusal of the O9A corpus would reveal. Indeed, the O9A has issued texts denouncing misogyny and rape: see for example Fake News.

° As noted elsewhere Myatt never carried an SS dagger in the pocket of his Barbour jacket {4}, but once did admit to sometimes carrying a .22 Bersa semi-automatic pistol.

° There is no three page document written by or circulated by Myatt concerning the Rules of Dueling. What exists is a short one-page statement by Myatt which we reproduce here:

[quote]
             “The most acceptable and civilized form of duel is by pistol, and those abiding by the Code of Honour are expected to use this form as and when necessary.

              A formal challenge to a duel must be personally issued, by one party to the other, at which a date, time and place are specified (Dawn is traditionally favoured). Each duellist must be accompanied by a Second, to ensure fair play and an honourable outcome, as there must be a referee.

              At the appointed time and in the appointed place, two revolvers, pistols or duelling pistols, as similar as possible, are checked and prepared by the referee, (ideally a man of honour should keep or have access to a matched pair of pistols specifically made for duelling, capable of firing one round and one round only). These revolvers or pistols, and the bullets, are also checked by the duellists and their seconds. [Note: whatever pistol is used it should be loaded or so adapted that one round and only one round can be discharged from it when the trigger is pulled.]

              The referee then allows the duellists to choose a weapon. The duellists stand back to back. At a sign or word from the referee they then walk a set number of paces agreed beforehand (ten being usual) before turning to face each other. The referee then says: “Take aim!” at which they take aim. The referee then says: “Fire!” at which they discharge the weapon. It is considered dishonourable conduct to aim and/or fire before the referee gives the signal to so do.

              Should one person fire and miss, or hit and injure, the other duellist before that duellist has also fired, then the person who has so fired must wait, without moving, until his fellow duellist has also fired, if he is capable of so firing.

              Honour is satisfied if the duel is undertaken in the above manner.

Some Notes On Duelling

              There are four things which need to be understood about personal duels of honour.
              (1) The etiquette, or rules, of duelling must be followed, for it is these rules which make this encounter between two individuals a civilized and thus an honourable encounter. A duel of honour is not a brawl, or merely a fight between two individuals – it is a dispassionate meeting of two individuals who use their own will, their own strength of character, to fight in a particular way.
              The rules, the etiquette, of duelling make it such a dispassionate encounter – for a duel is a test of courage, of nerve, of character, of personal honour itself. Any and all conduct which is against the rules is dishonourable, and as such the person who does not abide by the rules is not an honourable person, and thus forfeits their honour and their honourable reputation.

              If the rules are not followed, it is thus not a duel of honour.

              (2) In a duel of honour, deadly weapons must be used. It is the deadly nature of the weapons used, with the possibility of death, which makes the encounter an honourable one. Deadly weapons include pistols, swords and long-bladed fighting knives of the Bowie type.
              (3) The duel is a private affair between the two individuals concerned. As such, only the nominated Seconds, and a referee – acceptable by both sides – must be present. It is against the etiquette of duelling for any other people to be present.

              (4) A person challenged to a duel must either personally accept the challenge, or decline the challenge. It is dishonourable and cowardly conduct to ignore a challenge once it has been formally issued. If a person who is challenged declines the challenge, then they must issue a personal apology, and if necessary, or called upon to do so, a public apology.
              A man of honour will only challenge to a duel those individuals whom he believes can physically defend themselves and their honour with deadly weapons. Thus, it is dishonourable and cowardly if someone who is challenged to a duel tries to get someone else to fight the duel on their behalf.”

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20090607223524/http://www.cosmicbeing.info/duel.html

[/quote]

° Myatt joined Colin Jordan’s British Movement in 1968, not in the late 1970s.

° The allegation that “if someone O9A could not find a suitable human opfer for culling they would sacrifice an animal” is laughable given that no O9A text mentions this and that O9A texts clearly state that they abhor animal sacrifice since there is an abundance of human dross who could be sacrificed, qv. R. Parker, Praxis and Theory of The Order of Nine Angles – A Précis for Critics, Neophytes, and Academics. 2012.

° There is nothing probative to indicate that Myatt in the 1970s in Leeds did deeds of random violence.

Conclusion

That journalists and others who repeat the allegations and lies made by the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group without ever having perused O9A texts such as The Seven Fold Path and without having studied Myatt’s post-2011 writings surely indicates something about those journalists and those others.

That the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group does not, in his 2020 or 2019 reports or in his audio rant or in his conversations with journalists and others, mention Myatt’s voluminous post-2011 writings about rejecting extremism and Myatt’s post-2012 philosophy of pathei-mathos is both interesting and indicative.

Has the “chief executive” even read those writings? Probably not.

What is his comment, for example, on Myatt’s article A Balanced View Of Islam and The West and his books Extremism And Reformation, and A Rejection Of Extremism.

If the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group has indeed bothered to read such post-2011 writings by Myatt, is the “chief executive” in his fanaticism and prejudice under the delusion that such writings are the work of “an evil mastermind” and thus designed to deceive?

Failure by him to provide answers to such questions is not an option. For if he believes such a delusion that such writings are designed to deceive, then surely it expresses something about the psyche of “chief executive”, about his own physis, about his character, and about his own personal and political agenda.

Furthermore, that the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group does not mention the rumours that Myatt may, for decades, have been either working for “Special Branch” or be or have been an MI5 agent provocateur {5} is also interesting and indicative. Is the “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group hyping Myatt so that Myatt can continue to be a State-sponsored agent provocateur and be seen by others as an icon of rebellion, antinomianism, Satanism, and terrorism?

Rachael Stirling
March 2020
v1.03

{1} For earlier attempts to demonize Myatt see https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2019/05/11/demonizing-david-myatt/

{2} See for example https://omega9alpha.wordpress.com/fake-news/

{3} Refer to https://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/dwm-rejecting-extremism-v3.pdf and also https://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/reformation-extremism-v3b.pdf

{4} https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/meeting-with-nick-lowles/

{5} See for example (i) https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/agent-provocateur/ and (ii) https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/undercover-spies/

°°°°°°°


Obsessed With David Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles Sigil

O9A

°°°°°°°°°

It is now apparent that the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group – a Maltese immigrant to England, a Zionist lover, and a recipient of money from Jewish billionaire George Soros – is obsessed both with a certain Mr Myatt and with the Occult movement, the anarchist sub-culture, the O9A, which the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group alleges Myatt created and is still a part of.

Hence his March 2020 (and libelous) rant on the “buzzsprout” media platform; {1} his desire to see that Occult movement banned as a “terrorist organization”; and his lies and disinformation and allegations about both that Occult movement and about Mr Myatt. {2}

That his lies and disinformation and allegations are and have been blandly repeated by the Media is indicative of the nature of the modern Media given that the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group has presented nothing probative to support his lies, his disinformation and his allegations.

A while ago we challenged the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group to provide actual evidence, and even mentioned an active e-mail address where we might be contacted {3}.

Of course he neither provided actual evidence nor contacted us. Which reaffirmed to us and others his hateful, prejudiced, and hypocritical, nature: in public, he presents himself as a champion of “hope not hate” while he continues to not only make allegations about those he personally dislikes, and is prejudiced against, but also fails to provide actual evidence for his malicious allegations. {4}

As we previously asked of him:

[quote]
             “in regard to your allegations about the Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA) have you studied the O9A corpus and such texts as the 300 page Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy? {5} If not, then your views about the O9A are – it seems to us, et al – as prejudiced as your views about Myatt.”
[/quote]

As Mr Myatt was fond of quoting: Δίκα δὲ τοῖς μὲν παθοῦσιν μαθεῖν ἐπιρρέπει, [The Goddess] Fairness favours someone learning from adversity.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev
v. 1.03

{1} Update, March 13, 2020: He repeats his pernicious allegations – for which, yet again, he provides no evidence, on a video uploaded to the Facebook page of his political advocacy group.

{2} One pernicious allegation that the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group regurgitates is that of “cat strangler”, which Myatt has many times refuted: see, for example, p. 217 of the book Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right edited by Jeffrey S. Kaplan and published in 2000.

See also https://web.archive.org/web/20091130205840/http://www.davidmyatt.ws/rumors-about-myatt.html which includes the following:

[quote]
“There is a lot of disinformation about me on the Internet and in various books; and many unsubstantiated rumours…

In such matters, the principle of personal honour applies, for an honourable person would either ignore such disinformation, rumours and allegations, or seek to ask, in person and in private, the individual who is the subject of such things. This is the honourable thing to do, the gentlemanly and lady-like thing to do, and those who do not do this – for whatever reason and from whatever motive – are acting dishonourably… Unfortunately, in these un-numinous times we live in and endure, people of manners – those who behave in a gentlemanly and lady-like way – are a minority…

Thus, in many ways, such rumours and allegations about me are a good test of a person’s character: of their honour and their loyalty…”
[/quote]

In addition, both the police and the RSPCA interviewed Myatt in 1974 shortly after the allegation of animal cruelty was made in a local newspaper, with both the Police and the RSPCA concluding that the allegation was pure journalistic invention, a smear designed to discredit Myatt, who at the time was heavily-involved in the notoriously violent neo-nazi group, the NDFM, and who had, the previous year, been released from prison after serving a prison sentence for violence.

That the so-called “chief executive” of a certain political advocacy group regurgitates such an old and discredited allegation makes one wonder if he was one of the MOACs [Myatt Obsessed Anonymous Cowards] who trolled the internet over a decade ago making allegations about Myatt.

In regard to that 1974 newspaper article, Myatt wrote – in his Towards Identity and the Galactic Empire: Autobiographical Notes, Part One, dated JD2452991.767, that it,

[quote]
“made sensational claims about me. I had in my naivety decided to give an interview (my first) with a journalist to talk about our new NS movement, the NDFM. I briefly mentioned how it might be possible for chaos to be created by subversive means, and subversive groups, as a prelude to a revolution which an NS movement could take advantage of, just as I made one passing reference to having a theoretical interest in “the Occult” and to having considered investigating it further. The journalist promised to let me read his final copy before it was published and several photographs of me were taken, with him suggesting I hold something to do with the Occult, which I again naively did. Our conversation lasted for about half an hour, during which he took a few notes (it was not recorded).

I assumed in my innocence that he would simply recount what I had said. Of course he neither showed me the article before publication, nor printed what I said, except for one short sentence about causing chaos. The whole article was a fabrication, designed to be sensationalist and to discredit me. This whole episode was to be a very interesting, worthwhile, experience for me: a learning from experience, as Aeschylus wrote.” Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20040419193109/http://www.geocities.com/davidmyatt/notes1.html
[/quote]

{3} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/12/01/open-letter-to-nick-lowles/

{4} In respect of his lies and disinformation and allegations see https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/how-to-spread-fake-news/

{5} https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2020/03/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

°°°°°°°°°


Banning The O9A: Update

°°°°°°°°°

Chant To Return Atazoth

°°°°°°°°°

According to a recent “twitter” post by Louise Haigh – Member of Parliament for Sheffield Heeley and Shadow Policing & Crime Minister – “the government must move to proscribe the Order of Nine Angles as a terror group. Their beliefs and tactics are horrific and they pose the most extreme danger imaginable”.

A danger so evident – apparently – in the latest O9A work titled The Seofonfeald Paeth (pdf) with its dangerous and horrific texts such as (i) The Esoteric Learning Presenced Through Pathei-Mathos, (ii) Esoteric Note On The Somnium Scipionis Of Cicero, (iii) The Acausal And ὁ θεός, and of course the extremist text The Place of Empathy in the Esoteric Tradition of the Order of Nine Angles.

What is evident is that Establishment critics such as Louise Haigh and Yvette Cooper – who is also a Member of Parliament – have never taken the trouble to read O9A works such as The Seofonfeald Paeth. Instead, they rely on the fake news, the disinformation, the accusations, and the lies, propagated by the likes of The Poison Dwarf and his anti-fascist associates at Hate Not Hope. {1}

This, therefore, is what the land of Britain has now apparently been reduced to: persons in positions of power and influence parroting the propaganda of political special interest groups and unwilling or unable to take the time and trouble to do their own detailed research and then as a result of such research draw their own conclusions about the topic or about a group or about a person. Do not do so is prejudice by any other name. Should they be ashamed of themselves for not undertaking such research? Yes.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev

{1} https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2019/02/21/full-of-hate-not-hope/

°°°°°°°°°


Hyping The O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Hyping The O9A
Anti-Fascist Propaganda And The Sinister Dialectic

For many years many of the anti-O9A crowd, and followers of the Levey (mis)interpretation of Satanism, accused “us” – we who associate ourselves with the sub-culture that is the O9A – of hyping both the O9A and a certain Mr Myatt.

As some of “us” pointed out, years ago, there is no need whatsoever for anyone of us to hype Mr Myatt, for his exeatic life – when objectively studied – is sufficient of itself to show how much he differs from the much-hyped Howard Stanton Levey. {1}

There is and was no need for “us” to hype the Order of Nine Angles since anti-fascists – and especially the hypocrite and propagandist, the non-English immigrant and Zionist, known as The Poison Dwarf – have brought the O9A unprecedented Media attention.

As witness the latest anti-fascist wheeze to get the O9A banned in Britain as “a terrorist” group. {2} A wheeze which has generated Media attention, led to an unprecedented download of O9A texts, and has even gotten Yvette Cooper, Member of Parliament and chairwoman of the Home Affairs select committee, to declare that the British Home Secretary “should immediately” refer the ONA to the government’s proscription review group.

This attention, and the casting of the O9A as the “world’s most extreme far-right terror group,” {3} not only works to “our” advantage but is also a natural part of our “sinister dialectic”.

To our advantage because the publicity will draw to “us” – to our anti-Magian esoteric philosophy {4} and to our Vindex mythos {5} – more like-minded supporters, since as someone once wrote:

[quote]
             “In my own life, I have tried to create some things which can disrupt our societies and which can lead to the creation of strong, really dangerous, ruthless individuals – some things which are so subversive that no laws could ever outlaw them, and that attempts to restrain them, to outlaw them, would only make them more attractive to some individuals.”
[/quote]

A natural part of our sinister dialectic because (i) such anti-O9A propagandists are still in thrall to causal abstractions and thus in thrall to the masculous dialectic of conflicting opposites, such as “fascist and non-fascist” and “nazi and liberal” and so on, {6} and because (ii) we and others, over centuries, have expounded what is beyond such a dialectic and what praxis or experiences or learning (pathei-mathos) can evolve us as individuals beyond such causal abstractions. A learning evident, for example, in the decades-long O9A Seven Fold Way. {7}

However, “we” are aware that all this will only be understood, in our era, by a few: by the Occult cognoscenti, by “our” Adepts, and by those who, like some artists and musicians and creative writers, resonate with our sinister-numinous aesthetic.

Meanwhile we remain The Occult Phantom Menace.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
March 2020 ev

{1} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2017/01/07/suspicious-propaganda/

See also https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/02/22/a-satanic-icon/

{2} https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51682760

See also https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/calls-for-neo-nazi-satanist-group-to-be-banned-as-terrorist-organisation/

{3} https://metro.co.uk/2020/03/02/worlds-far-right-terror-group-still-active-uk-12334019/

{4} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2018/07/29/traditional-and-modern-the-two-types-of-satanism/

{5} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/09/25/vindex-mythos-and-logos/

{6} Refer to (i) https://regardingdavidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/myatt-philos-in-real-life.pdf and (ii) https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/o9a-heretical-dialectics-v5.pdf

See also https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/08/27/beyond-satanism/

{7} qv. https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

°°°°°°°°°


Heretical Dialectics

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

O9A: Heretical Dialectics
(pdf)
Second Edition

°°°

Contents:

° Preface
° A Powerful And Influential Zionist Myth
° Reichsfolk: A New Interpretation Of National Socialism
° Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West
° Redefining Anti-Semitism: A Tale For Our Times
° Remembering The German Holocaust
° Holocaust Denial Will Not Be Tolerated
° The Vulgarian: Gift From Our Goddess
° The Vulgarian: Archetypal Homo Hubris
° The Vulgarian
° More Anti-Fascist Lies
° More Journalistic Propaganda
° Ignorance Regarding The O9A
° Appendix: The Satanism Of The O9A

°°°

The compilation is a small selection of articles originally published on our blog in the past few years, and which articles deal – in a currently unpopular and dialectical way – with certain modern heresies and/or which present a heretical (and occasionally an Occult) view about some current events and/or about certain people such as The Vulgarian, the current [2020] President of Amerika.

By the term dialectic we mean one or both of the following:

(i) characterized by the existence or operation of opposing forces, tendencies, opinions, etcetera; the tension and disputes produced by the clash of such forces, opinions, etcetera; and the revealing of truth (the insight) that can result from such tension, disputes, and clashes;

(ii) a disputant who disputes to be transgressive and/or to be heretical (antinomian) and/or to engender a dialectical response.

Given the misunderstanding about what the O9A mean by ‘satanism’ we have included here an Appendix which briefly describes the O9A view; a view evident in the recently published 300 page collection titled Seofonfeald Paeth Trilogy which is available both as a gratis open access pdf document from https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf and in printed form in three books: (i) Feond, ISBN 978-1687255624; (ii) Baeldraca, ISBN 978-1689931953; and (iii) Tyberness, ISBN 978-1696821742

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
February 2020 ev

°°°°°°°°°


An Example of Exeatic and Metaphysical Living

David Myatt

°°°°°°°°°

[quote]
Evola re-interprets the notion of War as a metaphysical duty. At the centre of a traditional society Evola locates a spiritual elite from which warriors derive their ultimate reason of being, their supreme justification of their actions. According to the traditional concept the warrior does not fight as a servile caste, is not a ‘profession’ or a mercenary as in a capitalist system. The warrior caste has its own spiritual and distinct way of living, its own rituals, and the act of fighting becomes a spiritual practice. This can be compared to the cult of Eastern combat which integrates fighting techniques with the Numinous. This is the definition of metaphysical warriorship.

[David] Myatt’s life has been a supreme example of this kind of exeatic and metaphysical living, and the West was clearly not ready to accept such a living as an example of a regeneration of the European man and his Volk. Georges Bataille was also drawn to this kind of living although he would not have supported the choices made by Myatt. Nevertheless the mysticism of Myatt, his Numinous Living, is a grand example of an ongoing Innerer Krieg and an ongoing influence of the sinister forces of the Sphere of Mars. Evola talks about ‘a spiritualized personality’, namely a personality realized according to its supernatural (metaphysical) destiny.
[/quote]

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20161230125837/https://ecstatic-darkness.com/2016/12/28/the-sphere-of-war/

°°°°°°°°°

Related:
https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2019/11/18/a-modern-pagan-philosophy-2/


A Yuletide Listening

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

In one of those Yuletide moments when – replete with mulled Cider and mince pies and warmed by a fire of logs – we three trawled the Internet for apposite items and found the following: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIkYhf3toG8

Which talk – by a Scottish “A.N. Other” – presents a remarkably rational and informed summary, by an outsider, of both the O9A and especially of Mr David Myatt.

Which talk is in stark contrast to the much Media hyped remarks in February 2019 by the misnamed British “hope not hate” organization {1} and which left-wing advocacy group, according to the admins of Wikipedia, is “a biased and opinionated source”. {2}

That the mainstream Western Media have promoted and will undoubtedly continue to uncritically promote the views of that “biased and opinionated source” in respect of both the O9A and Myatt surely – at least to us and others of our O9A kindred – exposes, yet again, something about the nature of such modern Media.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
December 2019 ev

°°°

{1} https://wyrdsister.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/how-to-spread-fake-news/

See also https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/2019/09/09/extremism-and-reformation/

{2} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

°°°°°°°°°


Open Letter To Nick Lowles

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

We challenge you, Nick Lowles, to provide evidence based on primary sources for your – in our view – prejudiced personal opinion that David Myatt is still a neo-Nazi and is still, or ever was, associated with the Order of Nine Angles. A personal opinion of yours which you made in your Media celebrated report titled State of Hate 2019.

If you deign to provide such evidence we will in the interests of fairness publish it. If, however, you decline to provide such evidence we will in the interests of fairness make such a refusal publicly known.

Furthermore, we enquire if you have read Myatt’s voluminous post-2012 writings about rejecting extremism – such as his Understanding And Rejecting Extremism {1} and his autobiography Myngath {2} – and if so whether in your opinion such writings are deceptive and the works of a trickster and, if so, on what evidence do you base such an opinion?

Given that, according to rumours, the TV production company “Expectation Factual” is planning a documentary about David Copeland and thus about Myatt’s possible involvement – an involvement as mentioned by you in a 2000 BBC Panorama documentary about Copeland for which documentary you were listed as a Producer – we also enquire if you still believe that Myatt was somehow to blame, and if so whether or not, given his expiative philosophy of pathei mathos, he in your opinion has changed and become an advocate of hope – of anti-extremism – rather than of hate.

Or shall we conclude that you and your compatriots at the so-called “hope not hate” group have prejudged, and are prejudiced against, Myatt in accordance with your hateful slogan НЕ ЗАБУДЕМ! НЕ ПРОСТИМ! and thus are pedalling hate rather than hope?

To be honest, we do not expect you to reply to this communication. {3} Instead, we expect you to either ignore it, or it to provoke you into more public anti-Myatt propaganda – and thus to more fake news {4} – based on your prejudice, on your apparent religious belief, that Myatt is still a neo-Nazi and is still, or was, associated with the Order of Nine Angles.

If you fail to provide evidence based on primary sources for your allegations, opinions, and assumptions about Myatt, and were you provoked by this web-blog post to more public anti-Myatt propaganda, we and sagacious others would be forced to conclude that hatred and prejudice rather than “hope not hate” dictates your opinions about Myatt.

In addition, and in regard to your allegations about the Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA) have you studied the O9A corpus and such texts as the 300 page Seofonfeald Paeth trilogy? {5} If not, then your views about the O9A are – it seems to us, et al – as prejudiced as your views about Myatt.

Little wonder then that Myatt in 1990s challenged you to a duel with deadly weapons and which duel of honour you refused to take part. {6} Which refusal by you – and your excuses then and later – indicate much about your physis, and about the physis of Myatt himself. {7}

As Sonia Gable once was alleged to have said, you tried to blackmail her but failed. Which failed blackmail was apparently the genesis of your split from the anti-fascist Searchlight group and led to you founding the perhaps misnamed Hope Not Hate organisation.

TWS Nexion
Oxonia
December 2019 ev

{1} https://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/dwm-rejecting-extremism-v3.pdf

{2} https://davidmyatt.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/david-myatt-myngath.pdf

{3} Given your much Media hyped “research and security” departments we expect you to know our e-mail address as supplied to both the author of the Quietus article about the O9A and to the TV production company Expectation Factual.

{4} https://omega9alpha.wordpress.com/fake-news/

{5} https://wyrdsister.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/o9a-trilogy-print.pdf

{6} https://regardingdavidmyatt.wordpress.com/meeting-with-nick-lowles/

{7} William Segar, Booke of Honor & Armes, published in 1590 ev. https://books.google.com/books?id=LlI_AQAAMAAJ

We draw your attention in particular to The First Booke (p.4) of that text which is titled “For what cause the partie belied ought to challenge, and of the nature of the Lie.”

It thus seems as if Myatt was and is following the tradition of European chivalry while you et al are apparently dishonourably using the power of modern Media to make unproven accusations against – spreading lies about – a particular person.

°°°°°°°°°


The O9A And Empathy

Order Of Nine Angles
O9A

°°°°°°°°°

Empathy In O9A Tradition
(pdf)

°°°°°°°°°

Given how the Order of Nine Angles (O9A, ONA) has been misleadingly portrayed in the last few years in the Media, and even in Courts of Law, we reprint here an article published in 2011 about the importance of empathy in O9A tradition.

The article was subsequently included in the 2019 book titled Tyberness (ISBN 978-1696821742) and which book was part of a trilogy that presents an initiated and detailed understanding of both O9A esoteric philosophy and of the Occult methods of the O9A. The two other books in the trilogy are Feond (ISBN 978-1687255624) and Baeldraca (ISBN 978-1689931953).

°°°°°°°°°