Preparing For Another War



America is preparing the way for another foreign war as witness the accusations that Iran was responsible for the recent “unprovoked” attacks on oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman, with the American government stating that “intelligence about the type of weapons used” proved it was Iran and releasing a video which they claimed showed Iran’s Revolutionary Guard removing an unexploded limpet mine from one of the ships.

Which attacks and which video are almost certainly clandestine “Black Ops” by the American military designed to give the American government the excuse it needs to go to war with Iran or at the very least support a massive military attack on Iran by the Zionist entity that occupies Palestine.

The current President of America – the Zionist-loving Vulgarian – has spent the last few years implementing the agenda of the Zionist entity: he abandoned the nuclear deal with Iran that was brokered by Barack Obama; he imposed harsh economic sanctions on Iran; he moved the American Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem; he claimed that the Zionist entity has the “right” to occupy and build settlements on the West Bank; he authorized a vast increase in the sale of advanced military weapons to the Zionists; and he regurgitated and regurgitates Zionist propaganda about the Iranian government being “evil” and that there needed to be “regime change” in Iran.

Following the American claim that recent attacks on oil tankers were undertaken by Iran, the British government, still the American poodle, immediately issued a statement that said that the attacks were “almost certainly” the work of Iran and that the attacks “build on a pattern of destabilising Iranian behaviour and pose a serious danger to the region.”

This is how modern wars and invasions often begin. By claims about some nation or State being “a serious danger”, a threat to “democracy” and tyrannical and “evil”. By repeating ad nauseam propaganda and lies, such as the lie before the invasion of Iraq that it had “weapons of mass destruction”; by harsh economic sanctions partly designed to weaken the designated enemy and partly designed to provoke that enemy, such as the harsh sanctions America imposed upon Japan for years before World War Two; by claims by “intelligence” sources and “analysts” that the designated new enemy has indeed done or is capable of what their government claims; and by “Black Ops” designed to cast blame on the “evil” enemy for war-like actions that require a military response.

We might therefore expect a majority of the peoples of modern Western nations to eventually accept the need for a new war against the new “evil” enemy, as they accepted the “need” to go to war with Germany in the 1930s and as they accepted and supported both the invasion of Afghanistan and the invasion of Iraq.

June 2019

Update, 18 June, 2019. Following scepticism about the “grainy Black & White” video which the US government initially released about the Gulf of Oman incident they have now released colour images which they claim provide “definitive proof” of Iran’s involvement although all they show are individuals dressed in uniforms used by Iran’s armed forces in a boat of a type also used by Iran’s armed forces.

The fact that some “Black Ops” in the past have also involved military personnel dressed in the uniform of “the enemy” and using the military equipment of “the enemy” seems to have escaped the notice of most supporters of the US government version of events, as does the fact that such scenes are easy to fake as proved by Hollywood “war and action movies” which regularly feature people dressed in the correct military uniforms of the enemy while using the appropriate enemy military equipment, even if those uniforms and that equipment are skilful reproductions.

It seems the current pro-Zionist US government is relying on the sheeple in the US and the sheeple in the countries of their allies, and also on the pro-Zionist governments of Europe, believing their propaganda and their narrative that Iran must now “be dealt with” in military terms.


A Powerful And Influential Zionist Myth

Zionism And The Zeitgeist Of The West


The O9A And Islam

Order Of Nine Angles


The Emissary by Richard Moult


The O9A And Islam

Contrary to some Media reports, and contrary to comments made via “social media” and via other mediums of the internet, the O9A (Order of Nine Angles) does not, like self-described neo-nazis and like those involved with the so-called “alt-right”, have an anti-Islam policy nor does it preach anti-Muslim hatred.

Why not? For three simple reasons. First, because the O9A – being a leaderless Occult movement (a modern sub-culture) rather than a hierarchical group – has no official policy about anything, based as it is on the principle of the authority of individual judgment. {1}

Second, because even those independent O9A nexions and O9A individuals who identify with and who support National Socialism {2} do so on the basis of the Reichsfolk interpretation of National Socialism and not on the basis of the racist interpretation of National Socialism by self-described neo-nazis. For the fact that there are two different, post-WWII, interpretations of National Socialism {3} seems to have escaped the notice of most self-described neo-nazis, most anti-fascists, most academics, and all of the Media.

Third, because even when an O9A individual is undertaking an “insight role” involving, for instance, the “racist” type of neo-nazism, the Occult sub-culture that is the multi-form O9A {4} still – to borrow a phrase recently posted on social media – “eludes classification and morphs where necessary” since

“through the practice of ‘insight roles’, the order advocates continuous transgression of established norms, roles, and comfort zones in the development of the initiate […] This extreme application of ideas further amplifies the ambiguity of satanic and Left Hand Path practices of antinomianism, making it almost impossible to penetrate the layers of subversion, play and counter-dichotomy inherent in the sinister dialectics.” {5}

Which rather neatly brings us to the sinister dialectics – the Aeonic dialectic – of the O9A. Which Aeonic dialectic, as explained in various O9A texts both new and old, often involves supporting Islam against Magian influence and Magian power in the modern West because one of the five fundamental principles of the O9A is “the way of defiance of and practical opposition to Magian abstractions.” {6}

Even in the 1980s Anton Long wrote about supporting Islam as part of O9A Aeonic strategy. {7}

For it is no surprise to us that the anti-Islam movement in the West is supported and financed not only by the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine, but also by Zionists such as Daniel Pipes and Pamela Geller {8} as well as by staunch supporters of the Zionist entity such as The Vulgarian who currently (2019) is President of Amerika. {9}

In addition, the satanism that the O9A Occult movement supports – and which some of its nexions and individuals identify with – is a very different satanism from that of most self-described modern ‘satanists’ indebted as those ‘satanists’ are to the Magian ‘satanism’ of Howard Stanton Levey, the Yahoudi, better known under his alias of Anton LaVey.

For the O9A, satanism is

“based on the scholarly premise that – as described in the O9A text The Geryne of Satan – (i) hasatan – the satan – refers (in the Septuagint) to the chief adversary (of the so-called ‘chosen ones’) and to the chief schemer against those who regard themselves as the chosen people of God/Jehovah, and (ii) “a satan” historically (in the Septuagint) refers to someone who is an adversary of and who thus is pejoratively regarded (by those so opposed) as scheming, as plotting against those who regard themselves as the chosen people of God/Jehovah. Thus, for the O9A, a satanist is someone who is heretically opposed to those who believe they are the chosen people of God/Jehovah.” {10}

In other words, O9A satanism is based on opposition to Zionists – who regard themselves as the ‘chosen ones’ – and on opposition to the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine.

Understood thus, the Aeonic dialectic of the O9A movement in regards to exoterically supporting Islam and the National Socialism of Reichsfolk, is understandable, as is opposition to the Zionist myth of the holocaust, as well as opposition to creatures such as The Vulgarian and Zionist muppets such as “Tommy Robinson”. {8}

We find it most amusing and indicative that O9A critics, that journalists, that self-described modern racist neo-nazis and self-described Levey-inspired ‘satanists’, cannot understand the difference between exoteric (outer causal forms) and esoteric (inner, acausal, essence) and thus seem to have no comprehension of O9A Aeonic strategy nor of the wilful Labyrinthos Mythologicus of the O9A. {11}

But such is the Media-drenched modern Western world, in thrall as the majority of its peoples now are to Magian abstractions and to Zionist myths.

TWS Nexion
March 2019 ev

{1} “The principle or axiom of the authority of individual judgment in practice means (i) that no author, no individual, no nexion, can present or represent the view or the opinion of the entity termed the Order of Nine Angles, (ii) that the O9A does not have, never has had, and never will have an “official policy” about anything, and never has, and never will make “official statements” about anything; and (iii) that the only authority which is meaningful for the O9A is the individual one which results from the exoteric and esoteric pathei mathos of each individual who is part of or who associates themselves with the O9A.” Source:

{2} Such as the TWS Nexion (Oxonia) and the Secuntra Nexion (Italy).



{5} Per Faxneld. Introduction: At the Devil’s Crossroads. Per Faxneld and Jesper Aagaard Petersen (editors). The Devil’s Party: Satanism in Modernity. Oxford University Press. 2013. p. 15.

{6} The five principles are stated in the Glossary of ONA Terms (v. 3.07) dated 123 Year of Fayen.

{7} Refer to the O9A text The Practical Esoteric Aims Of Satanism written in the 1980s and published in volume III of Hostia in 1992.

See also

{8} A classic example of such Zionist support and finance is the Zionist muppet “Tommy Robinson”. See, for example, (i) and (ii) and (iii) and (iv)

{9} See, for example,




Image Source: The Emissary, from the Minor Arcana of Non Est Secundus Quia Unus Est, a book of Tarot archetypes by Richard Moult.


Modern Democracy At Work

Order Of Nine Angles


You just have to laugh. For the smarmy British politician – the chinless wonder – who goes by the name Michael Gove recently announced that he is supporting the current bland British Prime Minister Teresa May. Neither of whom, as befits modern Western politicians, have any front-line experience as “first responders” or as street-wise police officers or are combat veterans and who therefore lack experience of the practical hard – life or death – realities of life. {1} Which lack of such practical experiences means they do not have the wisdom, the insight, born of pathei-mathos. {2}

Both Bland May and Smarmy Gove are currently subsumed – as are so many other British politicians – by what has come to be named as “Brexit”, a plebeian portmanteau word unworthy of a nation which created the largest Empire our world has ever known.

Do those in so-called Western democracies get the politicians that the voting public deserve? Apparently so.

For to see modern democracy at work one has only to consider facts such as (i) that Smarmy Gove is positioning himself to be a contender in a forthcoming contest to be the next “leader” of something called the Conservative Party, and (ii) that The Vulgarian – the Vietnam draft-dodger {3} – was elected to lead the most powerful nation on Earth and is thus the “commander in chief” of its armed forces.

For The Vulgarian also – like Smarmy Gove – has no front-line experience as “a first responder” and no combat experience and thus has never faced the hard practical realities of life.

Instead, The Vulgarian is the archetypal Homo Hubris who in his macho dealings with other human beings instinctively reacts and thus commits logical fallacy after logical fallacy. Which is why that Vietnam draft-dodger – he of small hands and artificial hair – constantly indulges in argumentum ad hominem hoping thereby to deflect attention away from himself and his plebeian ways. {4}

Our heretical answer? Bring back the ancient Greco-Roman principle of καλὸς κἀγαθός {5} and thus a ruling aristocracy based on that principle whose members have the necessary pathei mathos born of a practical experiencing of the realities of life.

November 2018 ev


{2} Pathei Mathos – πάθει μάθος – essentially means learning from personal hardship and from hard personal experience such as grief or suffering or facing one’s own death. Pathei Mathos is the raison d’etre of Occult ways such as the Seven Fold Way of the Order of Nine Angles where there is a personal learning, by individuals, resulting from consciously undertaking practical exeatic experiences such as the Grade Ritual of Internet Adept. qv.



{5} qv. the chapter A New Pagan Metaphysics in the book Western Paganism And Hermeticism, available at


How To Distinguish The Order Of Nine Angles

An Interesting Response

Abdul-Aziz ibn Myatt


Our republication of David Myatt’s 2003 interview with Professor Michael {1} has generated the following interesting response:

Myatt: Sinister Proclivities And Intent?

Note: The article was revised on August 3, 2018.

TWS Nexion
August 129 yf


Extracts from Myatt’s interview were published in Professor Michael’s book The Enemy of My Enemy: The Alarming Convergence of Militant Islam and the Extreme Right, University Press of Kansas, 2006, with Michael writing that Myatt has “arguably done more than any other theorist to develop a synthesis of the extreme right and Islam.”

This Is The Post-Colonial Reality



This Is The Post-Colonial Reality
A Politically Incorrect Story

In part of the former British colony of India – a part now known as Pakistan – a former Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, was arrested on his return having been convicted in absentia of “corruption” in a trial which Nawaz Sharif and many of his supporters state was engineered by the military in order to discredit him. According to one report, in a draconian (tyrannical) response to his return, the military set up road blocks while the government not only shut down mobile and internet services but also deployed thousands of officers to prevent supporters of the Sharif’s from reaching the airport. The police also arrested at least 600 workers of Mr. Sharif’s political party on “security-related” charges. Such is the modern “democracy” of such a former British colony.

Meanwhile, in the same land, a candidate in the forthcoming elections, and 127 other people, were killed by a bomb; an all-too-familiar atrocity in that part of the former British colony of India now known as Pakistan, and an atrocity ignored by most of the Western media probably because it is all too common.

Such corruption – or alleged corruption – and such draconian measures and such violence and killings are endemic in former European colonies in Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. From Rhodesia (now known as Zimbabwe) to Nigeria to South Africa to the Congo to Pakistan and beyond the price of “independence” has been political corruption, violence, killings, and often civil war and often poverty for a significant percentage of the population.

Who in the modern West mourns those 127 people killed by a bomb in modern Pakistan? Who in the modern West mourns the tens of thousands of such victims in other such lands?

Few if any because their governments are fixated on their own insular political agendas. In the case of Britain – a once mighty, civilizing, colonial power – the current fixation is on the death of one person, and the poisoning of three others, by a nerve-agent; on the desire by the current government to leave the European Union, and with a visit by The Vulgarian In Chief who lived up to his reputation as an ignorant vulgarian by declaring that Scotland was not part of the United Kingdom. {1}

Furthermore, who in the modern West can see the causal link between the corruption, violence, killings, and poverty in former European colonies and the “independence” of such colonies? Only the sagacious who were they to voice their understanding would today be most probably condemned as “reactionaries”, fascists, and “neo-Nazis”. So be it.

Meanwhile, those with first-hand experience of European colonies know the now politically-incorrect truth. Which is that European colonialism ended the corruption that had been rife in such lands; established and maintained law and order; and established societies which – compared to their past – were prosperous and free from rampant poverty and disease. Thousands upon thousands of Europeans dedicated their lives – and often gave their lives – to ensure such things.

On a personal note, I have a friend who grew up in what was then a British colony in Africa. And that during the Mau-Mau rebellion during which rebellion he had an armed guard accompany him on his daily trip by Gharry to his school {2}. Before, and after that rebellion was crushed by British forces with help from loyal natives {3} he and his family could walk the streets of a peaceful Nairobi. Today – post-independence – the streets of Nairobi are places where robberies, murder, rape, and kidnapping, are rife (4}. Similarly, in that part of the Indian subcontinent formerly ruled by Britain and now known as India, rape and gang rape and poverty are endemic.

Are we few who understand the importance of our colonial past the last of our kind, as perhaps prophetized by Jean Raspail in the novel The Camp of the Saints?

If so, what are our options? For myself, I choose the ethical National-Socialism of Reichsfolk {5} with its commitment to honour, loyalty, duty, and fairness, and which – at least to me – seems to manifest the British, the European, the traditional colonial, virtues of fair play, decency, self-restraint, honesty, and humour in the face of adversity.

July 2018 ev

{1} As usual the arrogant vulgarian denied he had made a mistake and (as usual) described reports of his mistake as “fake news”. Among his other recent mistakes are the following:

{2} Despite what Wikipedia and other sources currently claim, a gharry was European colonial slang for any means of transport (such as a Land Rover or “mini-bus”) that conveyed colonial Europeans from one place to another.

{3} Contemporary – politically correct – accounts invariably overlook the atrocities committed by those involved in the Mau-Mau rebellion. Just as contemporary – politically correct – accounts of the native Indian wars in the United States in the 19th century often ignore the atrocities committed by Indian tribes against European settlers: the rape and murder of women and children, the mutilation and torture and killing of men both American and Mexican. That some Europeans, and some Mexicans, responded to such atrocities with deadly force was only natural.

{4} To give just one contemporary example:




A Negation Of British Virtues

A Tough Woman



The news that Nicky Spinks, a 51-year-old lady farmer, was the first person to run the Ramsay Round, a Scottish Highland fell route near Fort William, twice – a distance of 116 miles, and in just under 56 hours, a new world record – is most welcome news {1}. For it proves yet again that misogynists everywhere – be they Nazarene, Islamic, Judaic, or simply atheist or macho vulgarians – are dinosaurs, relicts of a bygone de-evolutionary age, desperate as those men are to cling onto the patriarchal ethos of the past four millennia.

Perhaps some vocal supporter of The Vulgarian In Chief – he who currently resides in The White House – can take up the challenge and run the Ramsay Round twice in less than 56 hours? Even so, has the misogynist draft-dodger, The Vulgarian In Chief, any such tough physical deeds to his name? No, of course not. He is all mouth and trousers; a spoilt rich brat who paid a doctor to provide him with a medical certificate exempting him from being drafted as a US soldier during the Vietnam war. {2}

Nicky Spinks celebrated her triumph – British farmer that she is – by eating two “full English” breakfasts. Which no doubt will not endear her to the self-obsessed pretentious “fitness” gurus of the modern politically-correct West.

As fell-runners ourselves, in the isles of Britain, we know how tough such fell-racing is. For us, her spirit and toughness harkens back to our ancient pagan ancestors when fierce, tough, woman warriors fought the male Roman legions who had invaded Britain.

Three Wyrd Sisters Nexion
July 2018 ev





The Anti-Patriarchal O9A

The Vulgarian: A Gift From Our Goddess

The Propaganda Campaign Against Russia Intensifies

O9A Insight Role
O9A Insight Role


The British Prime Minister Theresa May recently stated that the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, and his Russian backers must be held to account – with those responsible “brought to justice” – for an alleged attack using chemical weapons in Syria. Note the word alleged. For – as with the recent “nerve agent” attack in Salisbury, England – no verifiable, factual, publicly available evidence has been provided to substantiate the allegation. As so often, the citizens of Western governments are expected to trust their “democratically elected” leaders and the “secret intelligence” that such leaders state “proves” whatever claims or allegations those leaders – and the media – want their citizens to believe.

However, to place such rhetoric – such propagandistic demands for “vengeance” – into the necessary contemporary perspective: did the British government demand that the perpetrators of the August 2013 Rabaa massacre in Egypt – when an estimated two thousand civilians were killed – be “held to account” and brought to justice? No.

Did the British government demand that the perpetrators of the Tiananmen Square massacre of 1989 – when hundreds if not thousands of civilians were killed – be “held to account” and brought to justice? No.

Did the British government demand that the perpetrators of the October 2015 US bombing of the Kunduz Trauma Centre in Afghanistan – operated by the charity Médecins Sans Frontières – in which at least 42 civilians were killed and over 30 were injured be “held to account” and brought to justice? No.

Did the British government demand that the American perpetrators who shot down Iran Air Flight 655 in July 1988 – resulting in the deaths of 290 people including 66 children – be “held to account” and brought to justice? No.

And so on, and so on.

Thus the sagacious among us – and especially those with an esoteric Aeonic insight acquired via practical Occult experience – will understand such recent rhetoric by the British government and others (such as The Vulgarian president of the United States) for what it really is: part of the on-going propaganda campaign by such governments and directed at Russia and Iran because both Russia and Iran support the current government of Syria.

For the incumbent British government, the Vulgarian president of the United States, and their allies Saudi Arabia and the Zionist entity that currently occupies Palestine, not only detest and seek to destroy Russian and Iranian influence in the Middle East, but also seek “regime change” in Russia and Iran in order that the Zionist entity and their ally, the United States, can dominate the Middle East, replacing the current government of Syria with an American satrap amenable to Zionist influence and control.

Is such British and American anti-Russian and anti-Syrian propaganda therefore a prelude to even more NATO (American inspired) air-strikes on government controlled areas of Syria? A prelude for more ‘Specials Forces’ – American and/or NATO – to be deployed to undertake even more covert operations in Syria? Almost certainly. Is such propaganda even part of a America led plan to invade Syria? Possibly. For such propaganda is remarkably similar to that used to justify the NATO invasion of Iraq in 2003. Then, among the excuses was the fraud of Iraq having “weapons of mass destruction” while now among the excuses is the fraud of Syria using “chemical weapons.”

No doubt now as then Western mundanes will – in their majority – either believe such propaganda or be indifferent to the ignoble machinations and the sheer hypocrisy of their governments.

TWS Nexion
10th April 2018 ev



A Repeat Performance?

O9A Insight Role
O9A Insight Role


The political and media saga of Britain, most European countries, and America blaming Russia – on the basis of secret intelligence reports – for a recent incident in England involving nerve gas has similarities with the political and media saga the preceded the invasion of Iraq in 2003 when “intelligence reports” and “intelligence dossiers” were cited as “proof” that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and thus must be “dealt with”.

When years later it transpired – after the death tens of thousands of civilians in Iraq as a result of the invasion of Iraq – that such secret “intelligence reports” were incorrect, no politicians – such as Bush and Blair – were held to account or publicly admitted their mistakes.

In a recent statement, the Russians again asked for actual evidence and for the British government to cooperate with them in a joint investigation.

The political response by a functionary of the British government was:
               “Russia’s proposal for a joint, UK/Russian investigation into the Salisbury incident is perverse. It is a diversionary tactic, and yet more disinformation designed to evade the questions the Russian authorities must answer.”

Stripping away the political propaganda, the response amounts to:
               “Russia’s proposal for us to provide evidence about the Salisbury incident is perverse. Asking for actual evidence proving their culpability is a diversionary tactic because they are guilty, and the Russian authorities must accept their guilt.”

In addition, in a typical example of the fallacy of ignoratio elenchi – of diverting attention away from the failure of the British government to provide probative facts – a statement by a person described in the media as a “leading chemical weapons expert” was hyped by both British politicians and the media. The person said that
               “if the Russians are as innocent as they say they are, they should allow [the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons] to visit [Shikhany] as soon as possible.”

Thus, contrary to Western jurisprudence, the accused party are asked to prove their innocence while the prosecution are not obliged to provide probative facts to prove the guilt of the accused.

   That the matter of the Salisbury attack has caused the worst crisis in East-West relations since the Cold War was only to be expected, given the propaganda – and the fallacies – used by politicians and by the media in the West, and given that no actual evidence of Russian government complicity has been supplied. For such propaganda and fallacies, together with a reliance on secret intelligence reports and the almost complete absence of mainstream Western politicians and the mainstream Western media being unbiased and demanding actual evidence, hark back to the tactics used to try and justify the invasion of Iraq.

That the intelligentsia (with only a few exceptions) acquiesce in this, that a majority of the general public either do not care or are persuaded by such tactics and such propaganda, is evidence of just how little we as a species have changed – how little we have learned about ourselves and how so few apply logic – even after the fairly recent carnage of two world wars with the death of around 15 million people in the first war and some 50 million in the second.

Thus we can expect calls by Western politicians for more “sanctions against Russia” – which sanctions will cause suffering among the people – and much more anti-Russian rhetoric and propaganda, with there probably being vociferous calls by some politicians for Russia to be “dealt with” in military terms.

Meanwhile, the intelligence services will no doubt – at the request of politicians – be told to encourage dissent and “regime change” in Russia.

Yet were we to use reason and logic as a guide in the matter of Russia we might well conclude – given its past, its culture, its traditions, and its people, as well as its rational response to the recent media-made and British government supported Salisbury nerve gas incident – that it might well be the most truly Western nation of all, with those now arraigned against it just lackeys of a materialistic America led by a Vulgarian who will, as described the former CIA chief John Brennan who resigned rather than take orders from a draft-dodger {1}, take his “rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history” once the full extent of his “venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known.”

After all, who is the leader most reminiscent of the forthright men of Greece and Rome, of the European Renaissance? Vladimir Putin, law graduate, former military officer, and Judo expert, who brought order to Russia after the chaos that followed the fall of the Soviet Union. Or the draft-dodging, vain, pompous, irrational, vulgarian with tinted false hair?

TWS Nexion
April 129yf

{1} See the article The Vulgarian: Archetypal Homo Hubris.

The Vulgarian: Gift From Our Goddess

O9A Insight Role
O9A Insight Role


The Vulgarian – a trumpian by any other name {1} – exhibits all the traits of an egoistic, vain, and wealthy bully. He publicly boasts that he is “a genius” and yet has no documented, supervised, IQ tests to his name and refuses to submit himself to such independent testing. He indulges in argumentum ad hominem against, and threatens to use his wealth to sue, anyone who deigns to criticize him. He declares all criticism about himself and about his beliefs and opinions to be “lies” and “fake news”. He has paid flunkeys who rush to his defence and who not only publicly repeat his mantras about “lies” and “fake news” but who also indulge in argumentum ad hominem against his critics.

The Vulgarian exhibits the traits of The Deceiver, refusing to release his ‘tax returns’ or explain his suspicious medical exemption from combat duty during the Vietnam War.

The Vulgarian exhibits the traits of a narcissist, being excessively proud of his cultivated physical appearance. Thus discussion of his artificial implanted (and/or finasteride induced) hair – which hair rather resembles the colour of dehydrated camel urine – as well as discussion of his small hands are verboten, with he and his paid lackeys indulging in argumentum ad hominem against anyone who dares to raise such forbidden topics.

The Vulgarian exhibits the traits of the misogynist, believing that “you can do anything” to women: from “grabbing them by the pussy,” to kissing them, and should any of those women protest then The Vulgarian and his lackeys cowardly attack those women by declaiming that such women have a “low IQ” or are “attention whores” or are “telling lies” or are “desperate for attention” or are whatever is the macho excuse of the month.

The Vulgarian exhibits the traits of an ignorant pleb: spouting opinions which when checked against relevant and documented facts are invariably shown to be ill-informed at best and at worst are the result of prejudice.

All of which does not deter those who are like him – egoistic, opinionated, ill-informed, vulgar, misogynist – from supporting him.

That The Vulgarian firmly aligns himself with the Zionist entity occupying Palestine and is like a petulant, spoiled, child – a modern Nero, given the position of authority he currently occupies and the military power at his disposal – has not escaped the notice of those who despise Amrika, and not escaped the notice of those governments desirous of replacing Amrikan influence in the world with their own. For such people and such governments, The Vulgarian is their dreams, their prayers, made flesh. For everything The Vulgarian does, everything he touches, every ‘tweet’ or speech he makes, is guaranteed to reduce the influence and the prestige of Amrika in the world.

Let us therefore, in our diabolical way, hail The Vulgarian – The Lickspittle of Zionists – as the beginning of the end of the Old Order and as the (unknowing) Praelocutor of The Chaos that we desire. A gift from our goddess that we admit we did not expect.

Three Wyrd Sisters
January 2018 ev

{1} Trumpians are a type of Homo Hubris, distinguished from others of that plebeian species by traits such as their vanity and the fact that they belong to the Nouveau Riche and thus have deplorable, vulgar, taste and astonishingly bad manners.

The Vulgarian: Archetypal Homo Hubris

O9A Insight Role
O9A Insight Role


The Vulgarian: Archetypal Homo Hubris

That so many self-described modern ‘satanists’ living in America (and even elsewhere) seem to support, and have supported, a certain modern vulgarian is interesting and most indicative of the type of ‘satanism’ they uphold and believe in.

The Oxford English Dictionary {1} defines a vulgarian as “a vulgar person; frequently, a well-to-do or rich person of vulgar manners,” with ‘vulgar’ being a synonym for plebeian. {2} Which is a rather apt description of a certain ill-mannered person elected not that long ago to a certain public office in a former British colony.

Among the personality traits of a vulgarian are their egoism, vanity, and arrogance, one manifestation of which arrogance is that they personally hate criticism, and thus attack and try to demean and publicly smear anyone who draws attention to their vulgar behaviour. A vulgarian often uses their wealth, and/or their influence, to have some flunkeys try to find “some dirt” on whomsoever dares to criticize them while delegating other flunkeys to accuse such critics of all manner of things. In the case of a certain publicly elected vulgarian he simply repeats, ad nauseam, that any and all criticism of his behaviour – past and present – is “fabrication”, “fake news”, and then proceeds to publicly and smilingly demean his critic or critics and accuse them of all manner of things.

While most vulgarians have a certain animal-like cunning, their lack of intelligence and inability to think logically means they commit logical fallacy after logical fallacy, from argumentum ad hominem to argumentum ad nauseam to consensus gentium to a dicto secumdum quid ad dictum simpliciter. Vulgarians are also, by nature, cowards and bullies. Thus the person described by many of the intelligentsia as The Vulgarian managed to avoid being drafted to serve in the military during the Vietnam war by having a doctor sign a certificate stating that The Vulgarian had “bone spurs” on his feet, despite the fact that The Vulgarian at the time was a 22 year-old fit young man who played football, tennis, and golf, without any problem.

Hence one of his nicknames: Draft Dodger In Chief, for wealth has and had its privileges. When asked recently by a reporter from the New York Times about this convenient medical deferment, The Vulgarian could not name the doctor nor provide a copy of the medical certificate. {3} Instead, as egoistic, vain, vulgarians often do, he tried to shift attention away from his failure to provide documentation by trying to glorify his achievements, and thus repeated ad nauseam the following mantra: “I’ve made a lot of sacrifices. I work very, very hard. I’ve had tremendous success. I think I’ve done a lot.”

        That the “Draft Dodger In Chief” has (i) also been repeatedly accused of misogynist behaviour – to which he predictably responded with the mantra “it’s all fabrication, fake news” – and (ii) also has boasted about how he (Macho Man) will retaliate with “fire and fury” to any threats made against the country he cowardly refused in his youth to fight for, and (iii) loves the Zionist entity occupying Palestine, makes him an example par excellence of the type of ‘satanism’ that Howard Levey the Yahoudi (aka Anton LaVey) manufactured.

For that so-called ‘satanism’ is simply an exposition of the vulgarian ethos for the plebeian masses. That is, making the vulgarian the archetype to be aspired to: materialistic, egoistic, bullying, having an animal-like cunning, macho, ill-mannered, misogynistic; and thus part of the patriarchal, the Magian (Zionist-supporting), status quo.

In contrast, the O9A consider Satanism to be elitist, and a manifestation of the aristocratic ethos. For

       “outwardly, in terms of persona and character, the true Dark Arts are concerned with style; with understated elegance; with natural charisma; with personal charm; and with manners. That is, with a certain personal character and a certain ethos. The character is that of the natural gentleman, of the natural noble lady; the ethos is that of good taste, of refinement, of a civilized attitude.” {4}

Thus the O9A champion culture, manners, scholarly learning, and a noble, civilized, aristocratic, attitude where there is a disdain for uncultured, ill-mannered, vulgar plebs and their antics. A noble attitude manifest in the O9A code of kindred-honour.

Additionally, in their text The Geryne of Satan the O9A state that “as originally used and meant, the term satan refers to some human being or beings who ‘diabolically’ plot or who scheme against or who are ‘diabolically’ opposed to those who consider themselves as ‘chosen’ by their monotheistic God.”

Those who consider themselves as ‘chosen’ by their monotheistic God are, of course, the ancient Hebrews and thus – by extension – those who now affirm that they are descendants of those ancient Hebrews and that ‘God’ has mandated modern-day Zionists to occupy Palestine.

The ONA also state that the English term satanist – historically understood – describes those who adhere to or champion heretical/adversarial doctrines. What is more heretical, these days, than championing National Socialism, holocaust revisionism, and opposition to the Zionist occupation of Palestine?

That Levey-inspired ‘satanists’ claim that being heretical/adversarial means being a vulgarian really does say all that needs to be said about their so-called ‘satanism’.

2017 ev

{1} Second edition, 20 volumes, Oxford University Press, 1989

{2} Pleb: a common or vulgar person. Plebeian: having qualities or features characteristic of or attributed to the lower social classes; commonplace, undistinguished; unsophisticated, uncultured, vulgar, coarse, ill-mannered.


{4} Anton Long. The Gentleman’s – and Noble Ladies – Brief Guide to The Dark Arts. 119 Year of Fayen.



The Geryne of Satan

Nazi Satanism

Joy Of The Sinister